2005
DOI: 10.1002/jms.939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric method to quantify R(–)‐apomorphine, R(–)‐apocodeine and R(–)‐norapomorphine in human plasma and urine

Abstract: A method was developed and validated for the analysis of R(-)-apomorphine, (R-)-apocodeine and R(-)-norapomorphine in human plasma and urine with N-propylnorapomorphine as internal standard using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and single-ion monitoring after a single liquid-liquid extraction and silylation of compounds. The quantification limits were 1 ng/ml for apomorphine and apocodeine and 25 ng/ml for norapomorphine. Calibration curves were linear, within the range 1-100 ng/ml. Variation in i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S2) were assigned as aporphine alkaloids without N ‐methyl groups according to the [M + H–NH 3 ] + ions. Compound 19 possessed vicinal hydroxy groups based on the ions [M + H−NH 3 −H 2 O] + at m/z 219.0813 and [M + H−NH 3 −H 2 O−CO] + at m/z 191.0861, and was tentatively identified as norapomorphine (Libert et al ., ). Compound 25 had vicinal methoxy and hydroxy groups based on the [M + H−NH 3 −CH 3 OH] + at m/z 219.0808 and [M + H−NH 3 −CH 3 OH−CO] + at m/z 191.0856 fragments, and was tentatively deduced as asimilobine previously isolated from Stephania species (Semwal et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…S2) were assigned as aporphine alkaloids without N ‐methyl groups according to the [M + H–NH 3 ] + ions. Compound 19 possessed vicinal hydroxy groups based on the ions [M + H−NH 3 −H 2 O] + at m/z 219.0813 and [M + H−NH 3 −H 2 O−CO] + at m/z 191.0861, and was tentatively identified as norapomorphine (Libert et al ., ). Compound 25 had vicinal methoxy and hydroxy groups based on the [M + H−NH 3 −CH 3 OH] + at m/z 219.0808 and [M + H−NH 3 −CH 3 OH−CO] + at m/z 191.0856 fragments, and was tentatively deduced as asimilobine previously isolated from Stephania species (Semwal et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The reported LC/MS method for the determination of APO in medicines achieved a LOD of 20 ng/mL 27. The lately developed GC/MS method for the determination of APO after silylation involves a time‐consuming derivatization step prior to analysis, with a LOD of 1 ng/mL 25. In our study, LOD is 0.03 ng/mL and the whole analytical procedure can be completed in a short run time (2.5 min), ensuring the high throughout and sensitivity required in PK studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these HPLC methods required relatively long chromatographic times (usually more than 10 min) to complete a whole analytical procedure; as a result, these methods could not satisfy the high throughout required in PK studies. Gas chromatography (GC) or gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) methods were also developed for quantification of APO in biological samples 23–25. However, since GC or GC/MS methods require precolumn derivatization procedures to convert APO into volatile derivatives prior to analysis, they are inconvenient and time‐consuming for PK studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these studies, the lower LOD obtained were 0.5 and 0.67 ng/mL by using electrochemical detection [10,11]. The lately developed GC-MS method for the determination of apomorphine has to undergo a derivatization step prior to analysis [17], which is time-consuming and complex. In this study, LOQ is 0.4 ng/mL and the whole analytical procedure can be completed in a short time (5 min).…”
Section: Comparison Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1. A review of the literature revealed that several analytical techniques have been developed for the quantification of apomorphine in biological samples, including GC [5], radioenzymatic assay [6], HPLC with UV [7], fluorimetric [8], and particularly electrochemical detection [9 -15]. A flow injection electrochemical method (FIA-EC) and a GC-MS method was also reported for the assay of apomorphine [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%