2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a functional model which integrates human factors, safety management systems and wider organisational issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, their t-values are not given in the Amos output. Instrument (Redinger et al, 2002), Safety Diagnosis Criteria (Tinmannsvik and Hovden, 2003), Occupational Health and Safety Self-Diagnostic Tool (Roy et al, 2004) and the pyramid of chemical major accident prevention (Bellamy and Geyer, 2007). However, the inter-relationships among internal variables in the safety performance model appeared to be ignored or are not properly addressed, leading to bias or errors on evaluation results.…”
Section: Evaluation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, their t-values are not given in the Amos output. Instrument (Redinger et al, 2002), Safety Diagnosis Criteria (Tinmannsvik and Hovden, 2003), Occupational Health and Safety Self-Diagnostic Tool (Roy et al, 2004) and the pyramid of chemical major accident prevention (Bellamy and Geyer, 2007). However, the inter-relationships among internal variables in the safety performance model appeared to be ignored or are not properly addressed, leading to bias or errors on evaluation results.…”
Section: Evaluation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bellamy et al [2] analyzed the SM issue on the basis of human factors. They described a preparatory groundwork for the development of a practical integrated model to help key stakeholders (inspectors, chemical companies) in understanding how human factors, SM systems and wider organizational issues fit together.…”
Section: Review Of Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…operating environment, task and operator characteristics) that exert certain influence on the operators performance. They are used in human error analysis techniques (Kirwan, 1994); in tools for identification of latent operational conditions (CCHS, 2007) and "can be cause of some failures in other complex industrial systems" (Cilingir and Mackhieh, 1998;Bellamy et al, 2008). Hollnagel (1998) and Kirwan (1994) have listed different human error analysis techniques, including ATHEANA (A Technique for Human Error Analysis), CREAM (Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method), HEART (Human Error Analysis and Reduction Technique), HEIST (Human Error Identification in System Tools), THERP (Technique for Human Error Rate Prediction) and others.…”
Section: Analysing the Human Component Of An Accidentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finding ways to decrease the influence of adverse PSFs can ultimately lead to increase in reliability of operator's performance. In Bellamy's et al (2008) analysis of 8 chemical accidents, using a taxonomy of 850 factors, the factors selection and training, workload, competence, expertise, skills, peoples' capacity have contributed to undesired occurrences in more than 60% of the cases. The selected PSFs for our study were compiled from the set of factors given in HEIST-time, interface, training/experience, procedures, task organisation and task complexity, and the environmental stress and level of burden factors (Clemens, 2002).…”
Section: The Analysis Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%