2009
DOI: 10.1504/ijsom.2009.025121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a framework for lean manufacturing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lean practices such as kaizen, job rotation and crossfunctional teams contribute to continuous improvements with constructive involvement of workers. A wide range of lean practices can be found in the extant literature (see Womack and Jones 1996;Shah and Ward 2003;Anand and Kodali 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lean practices such as kaizen, job rotation and crossfunctional teams contribute to continuous improvements with constructive involvement of workers. A wide range of lean practices can be found in the extant literature (see Womack and Jones 1996;Shah and Ward 2003;Anand and Kodali 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this paper investigates the level of readiness of the T-ASI to provide a good foundation for the implementation or sustainment of the LM philosophy by adapting a measurement framework developed by Al-Najem et al (2013). Various frameworks have been proposed in the literature to assess lean practices (Furlan et al, 2011;Shah and Ward, 2003;Mady, 2009;Anand and Kodali, 2009;Nordin et al, 2010;Goodson, 2002;Panizzolo, 1998;Gupta et al, 2013). However, Al-Najem et al's (2013) framework was selected as the most appropriate for this study as it evaluates lean readiness (LR) based on quality practices related to LM (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Hu et al [27] proposed a multi-objective model to support decision-making in the selection of a portfolio of lean implementation projects in manufacturing companies. Anand and Kodali [28] presented a reference framework comprising 65 lean elements or tools, classified by the competitive priorities of the organization. Amin and Karim [29] developed a method to quantitatively measure the performance of a manufacturing system, establish its state of maturity, and detect the causes of inefficiency to then, select appropriate lean strategies.…”
Section: Lean Tools Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%