2012
DOI: 10.1504/jgba.2012.049504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a framework for services recovery for service industries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations were also observed by earlier workers [36]. These results are in agreement with previous workers [36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Similar observations were also observed by earlier workers [36]. These results are in agreement with previous workers [36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Piaralal et al (2012, 2014) have examined the relationship between human resource management factors such as reward, empowerment, teamwork and training on SRP toward customer service employees in life insurance industry of Malaysia. In another paper by Kumar et al (2012) have proposed that organizational, personal and human resource variables are related to SRP of service sectors in Malaysia. Guided by a framework developed by Boshoff and Allen (2000), the authors have added other variable, namely, trait competitiveness and motivation in proposed model of SRP for frontline hotel staff in Malaysia (Masdek et al , 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the researchers asserted that if a job is not explained properly, it may have an effect on job discontent, absence, poor participation, stress, turnover intentions, and SRP ( Ashill et al, 2009 ). However, job descriptions may not always have a beneficial effect, but they do have a high degree of usefulness in enhancing employee commitment and SRP ( Kumar et al, 2012 ; Ahmad, 2019 ). In a service context, a clear job description appears to be a good predictor of employee performance, since it has an indirect effect on the customer’s views of service delivery ( Boshoff and Allen, 2000 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%