2011
DOI: 10.1139/x10-175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a forest structural complexity index based on multispectral airborne remote sensing and topographic dataThis article is one of a selection of papers from Extending Forest Inventory and Monitoring over Space and Time.

Abstract: This paper presents development of a multivariate forest structural complexity index based on relationships between field-based structural variables and geospatial data. Remote sensing has been widely used to model individual forest structural attributes at many scales. As opposed to, or in addition to, individual structural parameters such as leaf area index or tree height, overall structural complexity information can enhance forest inventories and provide a variety of information to forest managers, includi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A relationship between structural complexity and basal area may be expected, since D b is dependent on stand density and material distribution in space [39]. Earlier studies found that basal area was related to Zenner and Hibbs' SCI [53]. In addition, previous research showed that structural complexity measured using SSCI was dependent on stand density as well, even though space-filling was used instead of basal area as a measure of density [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relationship between structural complexity and basal area may be expected, since D b is dependent on stand density and material distribution in space [39]. Earlier studies found that basal area was related to Zenner and Hibbs' SCI [53]. In addition, previous research showed that structural complexity measured using SSCI was dependent on stand density as well, even though space-filling was used instead of basal area as a measure of density [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The profiles obtained by the tomographic reflect certain changes in the vertical and horizontal directions of the forest stand and the variability of the reflectivity is regarded as the forest structure [3,[10][11][12]. However, the majority of current remote sensing-based research on forest structure ignores the impact that the overall complexity of the forest structure has on vegetation characteristics in favor of modeling individual horizontal or vertical structures [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synoptic capture of large forested areas is provided by space borne passive optical remote sensing platforms and has proved useful for the attribution of forest structure [1,[4][5][6][7]. However, the inability of passive instruments to sense below the principal canopy limits their applicability for assessing three-dimensional forest structure attributes, such as canopy height [8][9][10]. Over the last two decades, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technologies, and in particular discrete return Airborne Laser Scanners (ALS), have become an operational alternative to traditional forest inventory [2,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%