2011
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2011.000745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Fidelity Measure for Research on the Effectiveness of the Ayres Sensory Integration® Intervention

Abstract: Reliability of the process section was strong for total fidelity score (ICC = .99, Cronbach's alpha = .99) and acceptable for most items. Total score significantly differentiated ASI from four alternative interventions. Expert ratings indicated strong agreement that items in the structural and process sections represent ASI intervention. CONCLUSION. The Ayres Sensory Integration Fidelity Measure has strong content validity. The process section is reliable and valid when scored by trained raters with expertise … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
156
0
14

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
156
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, approaches have varied across settings in important ways. A well-designed fidelity measure has recently been published (Parham et al, 2011), however, and its use is likely to ensure greater consistency and fidelity in the application of sensory integration procedures.…”
Section: Implementation Science At the Research Design Level: Re-aimimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, approaches have varied across settings in important ways. A well-designed fidelity measure has recently been published (Parham et al, 2011), however, and its use is likely to ensure greater consistency and fidelity in the application of sensory integration procedures.…”
Section: Implementation Science At the Research Design Level: Re-aimimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It consisted of 28 items categorized under five headings: (1) therapist qualifications, including postprofessional training in sensory integration and clinical experience or supervision in OT-SI; (2) components of the occupational therapy assessment report, including history, occupational profile, and evaluation of sensory integration functions; (3) physical environment and equipment, including space for vigorous as well as quiet activity; (4) provisions for safety of therapeutic equipment; and (5) communication with parents and teachers, including collaborative goal setting and family or teacher education. As part of the development of the ASIFM, a content validity study was conducted on these 28 structural items (Parham et al, 2011). Ratings by international experts in OT-SI strongly agreed that each structural item was essential for the provision of OT-SI.…”
Section: Development Of Structural Elements Of the Ayres Sensory Intementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final version of the structural section of the ASIFM (Parham et al, 2011) was converted into a survey format consisting of background and demographic questions (Table 1) and the four structural section subcomponents: Part I (Safe Environment), Part II (Assessment Reports), Part III (Physical Space and Equipment), and Part IV (Communication With Parents and Teachers) ( Table 2). All parts were scored dichotomously (yes 5 2, no 5 0).…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations