2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Dynamic Diagnosis Grading System for Infertility Using Machine Learning

Abstract: IMPORTANCEMany indicators need to be considered when judging the condition of patients with infertility, which makes diagnosis and treatment complicated. OBJECTIVE To construct a dynamic scoring system for infertility to assist clinicians in efficiently and accurately assessing the condition of patients with infertility.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their study, over 60,000 infertile couples' medical records were evaluated using a grading system that classified patients into 5 grades ranging from A to E. The worst grade, E, represented a 0.90% pregnancy rate, while the pregnancy rate in the A grade was 53.8%. The cross-validation results showed that the stability of the system was 95.9% (Liao et al, 2020). Letterie et al, evaluated a computer decision support system for day-to-day management of ovarian stimulation during IVF following key decisions made during an IVF cycle: [1] stop stimulation or continue stimulation.…”
Section: Ovarian Stimulation Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study, over 60,000 infertile couples' medical records were evaluated using a grading system that classified patients into 5 grades ranging from A to E. The worst grade, E, represented a 0.90% pregnancy rate, while the pregnancy rate in the A grade was 53.8%. The cross-validation results showed that the stability of the system was 95.9% (Liao et al, 2020). Letterie et al, evaluated a computer decision support system for day-to-day management of ovarian stimulation during IVF following key decisions made during an IVF cycle: [1] stop stimulation or continue stimulation.…”
Section: Ovarian Stimulation Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andrology and embryology labs can predict gamete viability, uterine health, and potential for intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatment using patientspecific models trained on electronic health records prior to recommending IVF treatment [24,25]. A recent prognostic study by Liao et al [26] consisting of 60,648 medical records of couples with infertility used a random forest model to automatically identify indicators associated with better pregnancy outcomes. Lower age and follicle-stimulating hormone level, higher antral follicle count, and greater endometrial thickness all contributed to a better outcome with compound effects, highlighting the need for considering multiple indicators in risk assessments.…”
Section: Infertility Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning can fully account for the interactions between characteristics and incorporate new data to update models, in contrast to traditional statistical analysis approaches, which rely on a preset equation ( 14). In the realm of assisted reproduction, machine learning methods have previously been applied to evaluate and predict pregnancy rates (15)(16)(17). Researchers also have attempted to construct regression models to assess ovarian reserve by integrating single biochemical and ultrasound markers (18)(19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%