2021
DOI: 10.1002/nsg.12189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a drone‐borne electromagnetic survey system for searching for buried vehicles and soil resistivity mapping

Abstract: We developed a drone-borne electromagnetic survey system using a commercial multi-frequency electromagnetic sensor equipped with a GPS receiver, a WiFi serial transceiver, and an ultrasonic distance sensor to measure the height of the electromagnetic sensor above the ground surface. The electromagnetic sensor was suspended from a drone with ropes. The distance between the drone and the electromagnetic sensor was adjusted to minimize the influence of electromagnetic noise generated by the drone, and to stabiliz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, FDEM presents several advantages as it does not require any direct coupling with the surface. In fact, several FDEM systems are specifically designed to be operated while mounted on helicopters (Karshakov et al., 2017; Yin & Hodges, 2007) and, probably, soon, on drones (Mitsuhata et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, FDEM presents several advantages as it does not require any direct coupling with the surface. In fact, several FDEM systems are specifically designed to be operated while mounted on helicopters (Karshakov et al., 2017; Yin & Hodges, 2007) and, probably, soon, on drones (Mitsuhata et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, FDEM presents several advantages as it does not require any direct coupling with the surface. In fact, several FDEM systems are specifically designed to be operated while mounted on helicopters (Yin & Hodges, 2007;Karshakov et al, 2017) and, probably, soon, on drones (Mitsuhata et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One challenge of the UAV-FDEM system is the source of in-flight magnetic and electromagnetic interference signals that are greater than the resolvability threshold of the magnetometer [3]. Most studies point out that the electromagnetic interference generated by the UAV platform decreases with the drone-sensor spacing increase [4,5]. The electromagnetic interference can be neglected when the drone-sensor spacing reaches 6 m for GEM-2 instrument from Geophex®.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%