Development of a diagnostic model for detecting mild cognitive impairment in young and middle-aged patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a prospective observational study

Abstract

ObjectivesObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep-disordered breathing condition linked to the accelerated onset of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, the prevalence of undiagnosed MCI among OSA patients is high and attributable to the complexity and specialized nature of MCI diagnosis. Timely identification and intervention for MCI can potentially prevent or delay the onset of dementia. This study aimed to develop screening models for MCI in OSA patients that will be suitable for healthcare professionals in diverse settings and can be effectively utilized without specialized neurological training.MethodsA prospective observational study was conducted at a specialized sleep medicine center from April 2021 to September 2022. Three hundred and fifty consecutive patients (age: 18–60 years) suspected OSA, underwent the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and polysomnography overnight. Demographic and clinical data, including polysomnographic sleep parameters and additional cognitive function assessments were collected from OSA patients. The data were divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets, and predictors of MCI were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Models were evaluated for predictive accuracy and calibration, with nomograms for application.ResultsTwo hundred and thirty-three patients with newly diagnosed OSA were enrolled. The proportion of patients with MCI was 38.2%. Three diagnostic models, each with an accompanying nomogram, were developed. Model 1 utilized body mass index (BMI) and years of education as predictors. Model 2 incorporated N1 and the score of backward task of the digital span test (DST_B) into the base of Model 1. Model 3 expanded upon Model 1 by including the total score of digital span test (DST). Each of these models exhibited robust discriminatory power and calibration. The C-statistics for Model 1, 2, and 3 were 0.803 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.735–0.872], 0.849 (95% CI: 0.788–0.910), and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.763–0.896), respectively.ConclusionThree straightforward diagnostic models, each requiring only two to four easily accessible parameters, were developed that demonstrated high efficacy. These models offer a convenient diagnostic tool for healthcare professionals in diverse healthcare settings, facilitating timely and necessary further evaluation and intervention for OSA patients at an increased risk of MCI.