2020
DOI: 10.5423/ppj.oa.07.2020.0135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Daily Epidemiological Model of Rice Blast Tailored for Seasonal Disease Early Warning in South Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 ) revealed that temperature, with combinatory effects of precipitation and relative humidity, was the prominent driver that influenced the projected epidemic trends and the differences between North and South Korea during the near future period (2041–2070). Although precipitation and relative humidity did not dramatically change compared to the historical period, greater epidemic risks of rice blast were observed when the temperature reaches a predefined optimum range and both the rainfall and relative humidity increase, similar with our previous study (Kim and Jung, 2020 ). Moreover, during our experiments, the EPIRICE-LB outputs were highly dependent on the interannual variability in weather parameters in the scenarios generated by the GCM models, although these variabilities and the model outputs were offset by averaging them for a 30-year period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…4 ) revealed that temperature, with combinatory effects of precipitation and relative humidity, was the prominent driver that influenced the projected epidemic trends and the differences between North and South Korea during the near future period (2041–2070). Although precipitation and relative humidity did not dramatically change compared to the historical period, greater epidemic risks of rice blast were observed when the temperature reaches a predefined optimum range and both the rainfall and relative humidity increase, similar with our previous study (Kim and Jung, 2020 ). Moreover, during our experiments, the EPIRICE-LB outputs were highly dependent on the interannual variability in weather parameters in the scenarios generated by the GCM models, although these variabilities and the model outputs were offset by averaging them for a 30-year period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Some examples of the basic studies that link crop and pathogen epidemiology to the selection of biocontrol agents and fine-tune the spread of active ingredients for disease control are as follows [40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. Knowledge of the pathogen cycle of diseases is also the basis for the development and implementation of disease forecasting [47,48]. Moreover, the sustainability of modern pathogen control should be considered in addition to crop productivity, the ecological function of the crop, and the social acceptance of the strategy [49].…”
Section: The Basis For An Effective Sustainable Pathogen Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in Florida, the Strawberry Advisory System (SAS) based on local weather data allows growers to reduce the use of chemical sprays for controlling anthracnose, caused by Colletotrichum spp., and grey mould, caused by Botrytis cinerea [63], by 50%. In South Korea, the EPIRICE model was developed to assess the daily risk for the occurrence of rice blast caused by Magnaporthe oryzae [48]. The model utilises some climatic data linked to fungus multiplication, such as air relative humidity, temperature, and precipitation, and can be used to predict the risk of disease at an early stage [48].…”
Section: Disease-forecasting Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Korea, unmanned aerial vehicles are commonly utilized in most rice paddies for collaborative disease control (Kim and Jung, 2020). Disease early warnings that use seasonal climate forecasts (SCFs) with a lead time of a few months support collaborative disease controls requiring at least a month before the decision-making of scheduling and preparing the control activities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%