2007
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200600380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a CZE method for the determination of mizolastine and its impurities in pharmaceutical preparations using response surface methodology

Abstract: A fast and selective CZE method for the determination of mizolastine and related impurities is described. Response surface methodology was applied to study the influence of phosphate/triethanolamine (TEA) buffer concentration, heptakis(2,3,6-tri-O-methyl)-beta-CD (TMbetaCD) concentration, voltage and temperature. The optimum conditions were: 105 mM phosphate/TEA buffer (pH 3.0) containing 10 mM TMbetaCD, temperature 19 degrees C and voltage 30 kV. Validation of the method was performed in drug substance and dr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The progressive implementation of CE in industrial quality control of pharmaceuticals [42][43][44] is related to its advanced selectivity [38,39], especially in the separation of closely related proteins [45][46][47]. Further advances of CE compared to alternative separation strategies comprise minute sample consumption in the nL domain and the resolution of different conformations, even if the pI and the hydrodynamic radius are only slightly altered by structural changes [47,48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The progressive implementation of CE in industrial quality control of pharmaceuticals [42][43][44] is related to its advanced selectivity [38,39], especially in the separation of closely related proteins [45][46][47]. Further advances of CE compared to alternative separation strategies comprise minute sample consumption in the nL domain and the resolution of different conformations, even if the pI and the hydrodynamic radius are only slightly altered by structural changes [47,48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CQAs requirements were set as Rs 1 > 0.5, Rs 4 > 1.5, t ≤ 10 min. The difference in the desired values for the separation CQAs is due to the fact that Rs 1 describes the separation of two peaks of different area (an impurity and the main compound), while Rs 4 describes the separation of two impurity peaks, which present similar characteristics of width and height .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, applying the test concentration values for BD (10 mg/mL) and related substances (100 mg/mL), the obtained peaks for BD epimers and I 4 were very different for width and symmetry. Using the statistical method instead of the USP formula, it is possible to obtain a more reliable value for resolution [44]. The other resolutions were not considered because no problem was pointed out.…”
Section: Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second experimental design, due to the different concentrations of the analytes (BD, 10 mg/mL; BD impurities, 100 mg/mL), resolution values between I 4 and the previous peak BD 1 (R 1 ) or the following peak BD 2 (R 2 ) were calculated using the statistical method as the involved peaks were significantly different for area and width [43,44]:…”
Section: Calculations and Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%