Development of a core set of outcomes in children with severe neuro-disability and feeding tune dependency: a systematic review

Kapadia, Mufiza Zia; Balasingham, Chrinna; Cohen, Eyal; Mahant, Sanjay; Nelson, Katherine; Maguire, Jonathan L; Guttmann, Astrid; Offringa, Martin

doi:10.1186/1745-6215-16-s3-p9

Cited by 1 publication

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Inductive generation of outcome domains could be considered a limitation of this review. Previous reviews (Kapadia et al, ) have utilised standardised approaches to categorising outcomes, such as the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) filter (Boers et al, ) to assign individual outcomes to a number of prespecified key domains. The inclusion of a multidisciplinary team in this outcome synthesis process provides confidence in the outcomes and outcome domains presented in this review however.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The inclusion of a multidisciplinary team in this outcome synthesis process provides confidence in the outcomes and outcome domains presented in this review however. This review does not address outcome measurement instruments used to examine individual outcomes or outcome domains, as has been done in other reviews of children with neurodisabilities (Kapadia et al, ). Examination of outcome measurement instruments provides further insight into heterogeneity of outcome evaluation and also facilitates identification of potentially useful outcome tools.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All outcomes identified from data extraction were compiled into a long list of infant feeding outcomes. Based on previous evidence (Kapadia et al, ), it was expected that outcome terminology and assessment would vary. Outcomes determined to have similar definitions or themes were therefore merged.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is possible that important outcomes may be overlooked in trials of obesity prevention interventions and this may contribute to inconsistencies observed in intervention effects (Matvienko-Sikar et al, 2017; Redsell et al, 2016).Inductive generation of outcome domains could be considered a limitation of this review. Previous reviews(Kapadia et al, 2015) have Reporting of outcome domains in reviewed studies…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Developing a core outcome set for childhood obesity prevention: A systematic review

Matvienko‐Sikar

Griffin

McGrath

et al. 2018

Maternal & Child Nutrition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Synthesis of effects of infant feeding interventions to prevent childhood obesity is limited by outcome measurement and reporting heterogeneity. Core outcome sets (COSs) represent standardised approaches to outcome selection and reporting. The aim of this review is to identify feeding outcomes used in infant feeding studies to inform an infant feeding COS for obesity prevention interventions. The databases EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and PsycINFO searched from inception to February 2017. Studies eligible for inclusion must examine any infant feeding outcome in children ≤1 year. Feeding outcomes include those measured using self-report and/or observational methods and include dietary intake, parent-child interaction, and parental beliefs, among others. Data were extracted using a standardised data extraction form. Outcomes were assigned to outcome domains using an inductive, iterative process with a multidisciplinary team. We identified 82 unique outcomes, representing nine outcome domains. Outcome domains were "breast and formula feeding," "introduction of solids," "parent feeding practices and styles," "parent knowledge and beliefs," "practical feeding," "food environment," "dietary intake," "perceptions of infant behaviour and preferences," and "child weight outcomes." Heterogeneity in definition and frequency of outcomes was noted in reviewed studies. "Introduction of solids" (59.5%) and "breastfeeding duration" (55.5%) were the most frequently reported outcomes. Infant feeding studies focus predominantly on consumption of milks and solids and infant weight. Less focus is given to modifiable parental and environmental factors. An infant feeding COS can minimise heterogeneity in selection and reporting of infant feeding outcomes for childhood obesity prevention interventions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations