2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04233-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies on Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy (COSCarP): a study protocol

Abstract: Background: Clinical studies looking at interventions to optimize pregnancy and long-term outcomes for women with cardiac disease and their babies are inconsistent in their reporting of clinical outcomes, making it difficult to compare results across studies and draw meaningful conclusions. The development of a core outcome set (COS)a standardized, minimum set of outcomes that must be collected and reported in all studies-is a practical solution to this problem. Methods/design: We will follow a five-step proce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described in protocols for other core outcome sets being developed by the OROS group, all outcomes identified through the above process, will be presented in tabular form, separating maternal from fetal/neonatal outcomes, each stratified by the five main core outcome areas, and an online supplementary table highlighting all outcomes, their Delphi scores and the stages at which they were excluded will also be presented, for greater transparency. 12 …”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As described in protocols for other core outcome sets being developed by the OROS group, all outcomes identified through the above process, will be presented in tabular form, separating maternal from fetal/neonatal outcomes, each stratified by the five main core outcome areas, and an online supplementary table highlighting all outcomes, their Delphi scores and the stages at which they were excluded will also be presented, for greater transparency. 12 …”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in protocols for other core outcome sets being developed by the OROS group, all outcomes identified through the above process, will be presented in tabular form, separating maternal from fetal/neonatal outcomes, each stratified by the five main core outcome areas, and an online supplementary table highlighting all outcomes, their Delphi scores and the stages at which they were excluded will also be presented, for greater transparency. 12 Step 5: Mmeasuring/defining core outcomes On selection of a final list of core outcomes, we will employ the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments to assess measurement tools/definitions for included outcomes based on four criteria: validity, responsiveness, reliability and interpretability. 25 We will begin the process by listing measurement instruments and/or definitions for outcomes where universal agreement exists.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have adopted the approach of COS developers in the obstetric setting. (46) Equal representation of patient and professional perspectives is desirable; as such, we will aim to recruit at a minimum 50 patient participants and 50 participants from other professional stakeholder groups to the rst round of the Delphi survey. In recognising natural rates of attrition in subsequent rounds, this number should allow su cient representation through the three rounds of the Delphi process.…”
Section: Participants and Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reporting measures for studies of cardiac disease in pregnancy are currently in development as part of the Core Outcomes in Women's and Newborn Health (CROWN) initiative, but there is no known equivalent for RHD‐P, which has specific risks related to its epidemiology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%