2018
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2017-0177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a comprehensive noninvasive prenatal test

Abstract: Our aim was to develop and apply a comprehensive noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) by using high-coverage targeted next-generation sequencing to estimate fetal fraction, determine fetal sex, and detect trisomy and monogenic disease without parental genotype information. We analyzed 45 pregnancies, 40 mock samples, and eight mother-child pairs to generate 35 simulated datasets. Fetal fraction (FF) was estimated based on analysis of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) allele fraction distribution. A Z-score … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible solution to overcome this challenge is to use the expected median FF of 10% [25]. In the case of the AR and RCAR models, we used informative polymorphic SNPs with heterozygous alleles in mother and/or fetus to infer the sample-specific FF ( S1 Fig ), similarly to previous studies [2629]. Additionally, in the case of the AR and RCAR models, allelic count data at informative SNPs can be used to calculate allelic ratios, distinguishing maternally and paternally originated trisomies (see “Allelic ratio calculation” in Materials and Methods) according to their distinct allelic patterns ( S1 Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible solution to overcome this challenge is to use the expected median FF of 10% [25]. In the case of the AR and RCAR models, we used informative polymorphic SNPs with heterozygous alleles in mother and/or fetus to infer the sample-specific FF ( S1 Fig ), similarly to previous studies [2629]. Additionally, in the case of the AR and RCAR models, allelic count data at informative SNPs can be used to calculate allelic ratios, distinguishing maternally and paternally originated trisomies (see “Allelic ratio calculation” in Materials and Methods) according to their distinct allelic patterns ( S1 Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, three studies reported targeted capture NIPT to screen for chromosome aneuploidy, copy number variation, and monogenic disease. [32][33][34] such as early pregnancies or certain aneuploidies. 2,,35 A recent study has demonstrated the importance of prenatal screening for genetically dominant disorders caused by de novo mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 31 However, these methods require experiments that cannot cope with conventional NIPT method for chromosome analysis. Recently, three studies reported targeted capture NIPT to screen for chromosome aneuploidy, copy number variation, and monogenic disease 32–34 . However, their methods were time‐consuming due to 16–72 hours of hybridization capture after the preparation of cfDNA sequencing library.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have sought to design an NIPD approach for the detection of common dominant skeletal dysplasias, including OI, and several cases have been successfully diagnosed using these methods [ 66 , 67 , 69 , 70 ]. All previous OI cases detected using NIPD harboured COL1A1 and COL1A2 variants, making these genes an essential part of the NIPD panel [ 67 , 69 , 70 , 71 ]. However, owing to the heterogeneity of OI, diagnosis may be inaccurate if other genes led to OI.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%