The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2002
DOI: 10.1002/jrs.909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a combined confocal and scanning near‐field Raman microscope for deep UV laser excitation

Abstract: We describe the development of a combined confocal and scanning near-field Raman microscope for operation at deep UV wavelengths. This instrument is based upon a commercially available Raman microscope and enables far-field and near-field Raman spectra to be acquired from the same location on a sample. The application of the confocal and scanning near-field microscopes was demonstrated by studies of CVD diamond films.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The UV system was adapted for operation with a 244 nm laser as described elsewhere. 9,11 A Raman spectrum of a silicon wafer was recorded with each Raman microscope (diamond spectrum in case of the UV microscope) prior to the experiments. The silicon and diamond Raman bandwidths were used to estimate the spectral resolution of the instrument; the results, and laser power at the sample, are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UV system was adapted for operation with a 244 nm laser as described elsewhere. 9,11 A Raman spectrum of a silicon wafer was recorded with each Raman microscope (diamond spectrum in case of the UV microscope) prior to the experiments. The silicon and diamond Raman bandwidths were used to estimate the spectral resolution of the instrument; the results, and laser power at the sample, are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UVRR spectra were obtained with a Renishaw Raman System 1000 spectrometer described elsewhere (15), adapted for use at 229 and 244 nm using approximately 0.3 mW at the sample generated by an (36) and Raster3D (37) from the coordinates of the crystal structure of Im7 (PDB entry 1AYI) (1). (B) Fluorescence emission spectra of the folded states of wild-type Im7* (black), L53AI54A (green), H3G6 (pink), and YY (light blue) relative to the denatured states of each protein in 8 M urea, and the 8 M urea denatured state of wild-type Im7* (dashed black).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raman signals excited by UV light are much stronger for some materials such as carbon films due to resonance effect. 6 The drawbacks such as cost, sensitivity of detector and difficult system adjustment make UV Raman less popular as compared with visible and infrared Raman. The infrared Raman is a good choice for suppressing fluorescence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%