Development of a case-mix funding system for adults with combined vision and hearing loss

Abstract

BackgroundAdults with vision and hearing loss, or dual sensory loss (DSL), present with a wide range of needs and abilities. This creates many challenges when attempting to set the most appropriate and equitable funding levels. Case-mix (CM) funding models represent one method for understanding client characteristics that correlate with resource intensity.MethodsA CM model was developed based on a derivation sample (n = 182) and tested with a replication sample (n = 135) of adults aged 18+ with known DSL who were living in the community. All items within the CM model came from a standardized, multidimensional assessment, the interRAI Community Health Assessment and the Deafblind Supplement. The main outcome was a summary of formal and informal service costs which included intervenor and interpreter support, in-home nursing, personal support and rehabilitation services. Informal costs were estimated based on a wage rate of half that for a professional service provider ($10/hour). Decision-tree analysis was used to create groups with homogeneous resource utilization.ResultsThe resulting CM model had 9 terminal nodes. The CM index (CMI) showed a 35-fold range for total costs. In both the derivation and replication sample, 4 groups (out of a total of 18 or 22.2%) had a coefficient of variation value that exceeded the overall level of variation. Explained variance in the derivation sample was 67.7% for total costs versus 28.2% in the replication sample. A strong correlation was observed between the CMI values in the two samples (r = 0.82; p = 0.006).ConclusionsThe derived CM funding model for adults with DSL differentiates resource intensity across 9 main groups and in both datasets there is evidence that these CM groups appropriately identify clients based on need for formal and informal support.

A multi-stage process to develop quality indicators for community-based palliative care using interRAI data

“…Since the interRAI assessments are used widely in Canada, and in multiple other countries, these data provide a cost-effective source of information for testing and validating QIs. Although their main function is to assess the overall care needs of the individual, in order to drive care planning, interRAI assessments are useful for case-mix measurement [ 66 – 69 ] and quality assessment [ 39 , 70 – 72 ]. In Canada, public reporting on select QIs already exists for long-term care homes [ 73 ], and those receiving PC and their families deserve a similar level of transparency.…”

The interRAI Suite of Mental Health Assessment Instruments: An Integrated System for the Continuum of Care

“…These systems tend to have two main components: a) a classification system, based on clinical characteristics, to group service users into categories with similar levels of resource use; and b) a weighting system (case-mix indexes or CMIs) assigns ratiolevel numeric values to these groups that can, among other functions, be applied to funding formulas in payment systems. interRAI-based case-mix systems are available for nursing homes (307)(308)(309), home care (310), intellectual disability services (311,312), and intervener/interpreter services for dual sensory loss (313).…”