2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Building Performance Assessment and Design Tool for Residential Buildings in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers [72] consider methods such as the BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) or approaches such as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) as real performance evaluation tools, although they refer to performances in a more than qualitative way but in any case codified by means of scores and/or attributes.…”
Section: Building Performance Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers [72] consider methods such as the BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) or approaches such as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) as real performance evaluation tools, although they refer to performances in a more than qualitative way but in any case codified by means of scores and/or attributes.…”
Section: Building Performance Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research developed a methodology that considers the critical sustainability aspects and practices in Iran. After a thorough investigation of existing assessment methods with a view of adapting them for Nigerian conditions, Amasuomo et al [20] proposed the comprehensive performance assessment system for Nigeria (CPASN) consisting of three main steps as a level of sustainability, the indicators, and the outcome. Other research has been conducted by Shad et al [21] with an aim of developing green building assessment tool in Iran for an office building with five certification levels established to enhance environmental, social, and economic aspects of the construction activities.…”
Section: Existing Building Sustainability Assessment Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research considered these key categories as a reference to be adjusted according to the context of Kazakhstan. It is important to note that in other studies [20,40,41], these categories are pointed out as critical and primary categories in all well-known green building assessment methods.…”
Section: The Initial Set Of Sustainability Categories and Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, rating codes refer to it as a function of health and wellbeing (e.g. ventilation, view out) (Haroglu, 2013), whereas it is suggested that it should include factors such as education and awareness of sustainability (Mateus and Braganca, 2011) or even factors related to social cohesion and participation in the design process (Amasuomo et al, 2017). Such a broader understanding of social sustainability has implications not only in terms of the assessment model (e.g.…”
Section: Impact Assessment For Buildings: Advantages and Shortcomingsmentioning
confidence: 99%