2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12686-014-0336-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of 13 microsatellites for Gunnison Sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus) using next-generation shotgun sequencing and their utility in Greater Sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus)

Abstract: Gunnison Sage-grouse are an obligate sagebrush species that has experienced significant population declines and has been proposed for listing under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. In order to examine levels of connectivity among Gunnison Sage-grouse leks, we identified 13 novel microsatellite loci though next-generation shotgun sequencing, and tested them on the closely related Greater Sage-grouse. The number of alleles per locus ranged from 2 to 12. No loci were found to be linked, although 2 loci revealed s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To maximize the sequence information available for BLAST searches, we did not limit ourselves to the RAD-tag 'stack' sequences but instead assembled the combined paired-end data with Abyss (Simpson et al, 2009) using a hash length of 27. We also included whole-genome shotgun data from a previous 100-bp paired-end Illumina sequencing run of C. minimus that had been performed for microsatellite detection (Castoe et al, 2012;Fike et al, 2015). This run was assembled with CLC Genomics Workbench using automatic bubble sizes, a mismatch penalty of 2 and an indel penalty of 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maximize the sequence information available for BLAST searches, we did not limit ourselves to the RAD-tag 'stack' sequences but instead assembled the combined paired-end data with Abyss (Simpson et al, 2009) using a hash length of 27. We also included whole-genome shotgun data from a previous 100-bp paired-end Illumina sequencing run of C. minimus that had been performed for microsatellite detection (Castoe et al, 2012;Fike et al, 2015). This run was assembled with CLC Genomics Workbench using automatic bubble sizes, a mismatch penalty of 2 and an indel penalty of 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We amplified 22 grouse-specific microsatellite loci using the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and with the components and concentrations described in Oyler-McCance and Fike [90] with thermal profiles and annealing temperatures as originally published. The microsatellite primers used included: MSP11, MSP18, reSGCA5, reSGCA11, SG21, SG23, SG24, SG28, SG29, SG30, SG31, SG33, SG36, SG38, SG39, SGCTAT1, SGMS06.4, SGMS06.8, TTT3, TUT3, TUT4, and WYBG6 [91][92][93][94][95][96]. See Zimmerman et al [73] for details on DNA extraction and genotyping.…”
Section: Microsatellite Genotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details on DNA extraction, microsatellite characterization, and duplicate sample elimination were previously published (Zimmerman et al, 2019). Samples were genotyped with 22 microsatellite loci (Caizergues et al, 2003; Fike et al, 2015; Oyler‐McCance & St. John, 2010; Piertney & Höglund, 2001; Segelbacher et al, 2000; Taylor et al, 2003), using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with components and concentrations as described in Oyler‐McCance and Fike (2011) and thermal profiles as originally published. Duplicate noninvasive samples (Gunnison Basin only) were identified and removed using a combination of the R package allelematch (Galpern et al, 2012) and the stand‐alone program Dropout (McKelvey & Schwartz, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%