2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development in vibration-based structural damage detection technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
278
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 513 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
278
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last twenty years several approaches have been proposed for damage identification based on the analysis of responses to vibrations recorded on the structures. In references Yan et al, 2007 andFan et al 2011 comprehensive state-of-the-art are reported. A very diffuse approach to the problem of damage detection is based on the analysis of changes of modal characteristics between the original (undamaged) state and the (possibly damaged) current state.…”
Section: Shm For Seismic Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the last twenty years several approaches have been proposed for damage identification based on the analysis of responses to vibrations recorded on the structures. In references Yan et al, 2007 andFan et al 2011 comprehensive state-of-the-art are reported. A very diffuse approach to the problem of damage detection is based on the analysis of changes of modal characteristics between the original (undamaged) state and the (possibly damaged) current state.…”
Section: Shm For Seismic Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To 3.3-5 overcome limitations in this assessment process, significant efforts have been made to design remote systems capable of relaying information about scour reducing the need for manual intervention. These systems can be broadly categorized as follows (Prendergast & Gavin 2014): single-use devices (NCHRP 2009;Briaud et al 2011), pulse or radar devices (Forde et al 1999;Yu 2009;Yankielun & Zabilansky 1999), buried or driven rod systems (NCHRP 2009;De Falco & Mele 2002;Zarafshan et al 2012;Fisher et al 2013), sound-wave devices (Nassif et al 2002;Fisher et al 2013;Anderson et al 2007), fiber-Bragg grating devices (Lin et al 2006;May et al 2002) and electrical conductivity devices (Anderson et al 2007). Table 1 gives an overview of the function and detection methodology of a number of types of instrument available.…”
Section: Shm For Scourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the performance indicators used for monitoring purposes have been modal-based parameters. Many techniques incorporating modal parameters have been proposed, developed, and expanded upon over the years, several of which are detailed in the following review papers [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. However, the accurate determination of modal parameters from in-service bridges has proven to be quite a non-trivial task that faces numerous challenges and limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical damage identification methods found in the literature are usually developed by processing structural dynamic responses. Such methods can be largely categorized into two groups: vibration-based damage detection methods [5][6][7] and wave-propagation-based damage inspection methods [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%