2013
DOI: 10.1080/15228835.2013.814750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development Guidelines from a Study of Suicide Prevention Mobile Applications (Apps)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The apps were Destructive Issues [43], Teen Depression Connect [43], Teen Hotline [43], Primary School Assessments [21], Preschooler Assessments [21], and Your Child’s Social Health [21]. These analyses concluded that none of these apps have been subject to research evaluation and that the content of some did not reflect best practice guidelines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apps were Destructive Issues [43], Teen Depression Connect [43], Teen Hotline [43], Primary School Assessments [21], Preschooler Assessments [21], and Your Child’s Social Health [21]. These analyses concluded that none of these apps have been subject to research evaluation and that the content of some did not reflect best practice guidelines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with previous eHealth and suicide prevention reviews [10,20,21, 24] we rated broader app quality indicators. These quality-related features included: the type of developer or provider of the app (Q1); whether the provider name or contact details was explicitly stated within the app (Q2); whether references for the source of app content was included (Q3); whether a privacy policy was included within the app or app store description (Q4); whether the app could be protected with an account login, password or personal identification number (Q5); and whether bugs or reliability issues were apparent through use of the app (although the reviewers did not seek to exhaustively test the app for reliability; Q6).…”
Section: Data Itemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Whilst it is important to connect this research to that of others working in the area of apps, tablets and Smartphones for suicide prevention (Aguirre, McCoy, & Roan, 2013), the way the authors have done this makes it difficult to compare their results to those of others.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%