2021
DOI: 10.1017/9781108873871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development, (Dual) Citizenship and Its Discontents in Africa

Abstract: Drawing on rich oral histories from over two hundred in-depth interviews in West Africa, Europe, and North America, Robtel Neajai Pailey examines socio-economic change in Liberia, Africa's first black republic, through the prism of citizenship. Marking how historical policy changes on citizenship and contemporary public discourse on dual citizenship have impacted development policy and practice, she reveals that as Liberia transformed from a country of immigration to one of emigration, so too did the nature of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 157 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Refugees are, at best, celebrated as "resilient" partners and participants, though their role is often cir-cumscribed by limited powers to actually set agendas, mobilize resources, or meaningfully influence decision-making (Ilcan & Rygiel, 2015;Brankamp, 2018;Turner, 2020). Meanwhile, critical research on migration and aid time again highlights the enduring coloniality, racism, and epistemic erasures of academic practices in studying or "producing knowledge" about people governed through humanitarian administration (Benton, 2016;Chimni, 2009;Pailey, 2020). While alternative methodologies are too numerous to be comprehensively exposed here, I sketch three interrelated "subversive acts of scholarship" (Pailey, 2020, p. 736) that may guide this insurgent work within humanitarian spaces: infiltration, slow scholarship, and accompaniment.…”
Section: Demarcating Boundaries: Infiltration Slow Scholarship Accompanimentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refugees are, at best, celebrated as "resilient" partners and participants, though their role is often cir-cumscribed by limited powers to actually set agendas, mobilize resources, or meaningfully influence decision-making (Ilcan & Rygiel, 2015;Brankamp, 2018;Turner, 2020). Meanwhile, critical research on migration and aid time again highlights the enduring coloniality, racism, and epistemic erasures of academic practices in studying or "producing knowledge" about people governed through humanitarian administration (Benton, 2016;Chimni, 2009;Pailey, 2020). While alternative methodologies are too numerous to be comprehensively exposed here, I sketch three interrelated "subversive acts of scholarship" (Pailey, 2020, p. 736) that may guide this insurgent work within humanitarian spaces: infiltration, slow scholarship, and accompaniment.…”
Section: Demarcating Boundaries: Infiltration Slow Scholarship Accompanimentmentioning
confidence: 99%