1972
DOI: 10.1037/h0032104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development, drop, and death.

Abstract: In cross-sectional comparisons of their original scores, nonsurviving, older subjects and those who refused to be retested scored consistently below retestees. These results point to the heterogeneity of the aging population and to biases in the sampling process. Analysis of scores by going backward in age (negative age) starting with the time of death as the zero point suggests the occurrence of lower limits in performance (lethal limit). Decline with age is attributed to a sudden drop in performance occurrin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
158
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(56 reference statements)
12
158
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, after other socio-demographic factors were controlled for, cognitive performance seemed to be an important factor that affected the return of individuals for follow-up assessments. With respect to those individuals who died during the follow-up period, this is consistent with the terminal drop theory [24], which predicts an abrupt decline in cognitive functioning just before death. Why a lower memory performance affected participation among the "refusal" drop-outs is less obvious but seems consistent with the results of Levin et al [25], who showed that cognitive impairment contributes to attrition bias.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, after other socio-demographic factors were controlled for, cognitive performance seemed to be an important factor that affected the return of individuals for follow-up assessments. With respect to those individuals who died during the follow-up period, this is consistent with the terminal drop theory [24], which predicts an abrupt decline in cognitive functioning just before death. Why a lower memory performance affected participation among the "refusal" drop-outs is less obvious but seems consistent with the results of Levin et al [25], who showed that cognitive impairment contributes to attrition bias.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Reaching back to seminal work in the 1960s and 1970s (Kleemeier, 1962;Palmore & Cleveland, 1976;Riegel & Riegel, 1972;Siegler, 1975), it has long been established that latelife changes are often not only influenced by age-related factors, but also by factors related to approaching death. In particular, the terminal decline concept suggests that progressive mechanisms leading towards death fundamentally shape the course and nature of changes that often accompany the last years and months of life.…”
Section: Self-esteem Trajectories At the End Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riegel & Riegel, 1972). Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that individuals who dropped out because they died evinced steeper declines than the surviving nonparticipants and study participants because of "terminal decline" (Riegel & Riegel, 1972).…”
Section: Decomposition Of Longitudinal Selectivity Into Mortalityassomentioning
confidence: 99%