2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2020.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development challenges of high concentration monoclonal antibody formulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, CTK may be considered a potential critical quality attribute (pCQA) for subcutaneous (SC) administration. SC administration, an increasingly attractive alternative to IV administration for therapeutic antibodies, , replaces lengthy and costly infusions and enables at-home or even self-administrations , (a key benefit especially in the midst of a global coronavirus pandemic). SC administration raises additional pharmacokinetic (PK) concerns for drug development though because of incomplete bioavailability, where only a fraction of the dosed material successfully transports into circulation. , For instance, prior studies alluded to a relationship between the introduction of multiple positive charges and a decrease in SC bioavailability, , with plausible mechanisms including ionic interactions with the net negatively charged SC space , and/or increased first-pass catabolism by hematopoietic cells. , Although the exact mechanisms governing incomplete bioavailability are not fully understood, positively charged modifications such as CTK may be broadly and conservatively classified as adversely impacting SC PK based on the above findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, CTK may be considered a potential critical quality attribute (pCQA) for subcutaneous (SC) administration. SC administration, an increasingly attractive alternative to IV administration for therapeutic antibodies, , replaces lengthy and costly infusions and enables at-home or even self-administrations , (a key benefit especially in the midst of a global coronavirus pandemic). SC administration raises additional pharmacokinetic (PK) concerns for drug development though because of incomplete bioavailability, where only a fraction of the dosed material successfully transports into circulation. , For instance, prior studies alluded to a relationship between the introduction of multiple positive charges and a decrease in SC bioavailability, , with plausible mechanisms including ionic interactions with the net negatively charged SC space , and/or increased first-pass catabolism by hematopoietic cells. , Although the exact mechanisms governing incomplete bioavailability are not fully understood, positively charged modifications such as CTK may be broadly and conservatively classified as adversely impacting SC PK based on the above findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, CTK may be considered a potential critical quality attribute (pCQA) for subcutaneous (SC) administration. SC administration, an increasingly attractive alternative to IV administration for therapeutic antibodies, 8,9 replaces lengthy and costly infusions and enables at-home or even selfadministrations 10,11 (a key benefit especially in the midst of a global coronavirus pandemic 12 ). SC administration raises additional pharmacokinetic (PK) concerns for drug development though because of incomplete bioavailability, where only a fraction of the dosed material successfully transports into circulation.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Challenges of SC preparation formulation are related to the final product manufacturing, stability assurance as well as injectability of the medicine. 17 SC formulations are manufactured as liquid preparations in self-administration devices, so lower stability is expected and hence a shorter shelf-life. Also, a small number of buffers and excipients are approved for these types of formulations.…”
Section: Comparison Of IV and Sc Administration Routesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Protein solutions, such as recombinant globular proteins and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, are routinely formulated and subcutaneously administered at high concentrations (>50 mg/mL) due to potency concerns. 6 Undesirable high viscosity is a common occurrence in high-concentration formulations/ injections, which may even alter or render the drug ineffective. 7 Numerous variables other than the concentration, related to either the protein biomolecule (surface charge, shape, and molecular and charge anisotropy) or solution conditions (salt concentration, pH, solvent viscosity, and temperature) can further affect the protein solution viscosity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein solutions, such as recombinant globular proteins and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, are routinely formulated and subcutaneously administered at high concentrations (>50 mg/mL) due to potency concerns . Undesirable high viscosity is a common occurrence in high-concentration formulations/injections, which may even alter or render the drug ineffective .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%