2021
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1945691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of the mirror image comfort and avoidance scale (MICAS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current body image and satisfaction scales vaguely capture the mirror viewing experience and provide minimal discussion about the impact mirror viewing can have on women undergoing a mastectomy. The development of instruments that examine the mirror viewing experience, such as the Mirror Image Comfort and Avoidance Scale (MICAS; Freysteinson et al, 2021), is needed. The lack of quantitative studies in this review emphasizes the need for interventional studies to better understand this phenomenon, including how mirror use impacts body image, appearance satisfaction, body comfort, self‐care and quality of life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current body image and satisfaction scales vaguely capture the mirror viewing experience and provide minimal discussion about the impact mirror viewing can have on women undergoing a mastectomy. The development of instruments that examine the mirror viewing experience, such as the Mirror Image Comfort and Avoidance Scale (MICAS; Freysteinson et al, 2021), is needed. The lack of quantitative studies in this review emphasizes the need for interventional studies to better understand this phenomenon, including how mirror use impacts body image, appearance satisfaction, body comfort, self‐care and quality of life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, participants expressed appreciation that this personal experience was being studied (i.e. Freysteinson, 1994;Freysteinson et al, 2012;Freysteinson et al, 2014;Freysteinson et al, 2017;Freysteinson et al, 2018;Freysteinson, Sarbacker, et al, 2021;Freysteinson, Keele, et al, 2021). As such, we are not shocked to see significant 'shame' and 'stigma' concerns or the suggestion that mirrors should not be used in this population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%