2015
DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1015000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of the Total HUman Model for Safety (THUMS) Toward Further Understanding of Occupant Injury Mechanisms in Precrash and During Crash

Abstract: Objective: Active safety devices such as automatic emergency brake (AEB) and precrash seat belt have the potential to accomplish further reduction in the number of the fatalities due to automotive accidents. However, their effectiveness should be investigated by more accurate estimations of their interaction with human bodies. Computational human body models are suitable for investigation, especially considering muscular tone effects on occupant motions and injury outcomes. However, the conventional modeling a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the years, there has been much progress in the development of FE models for impact and injury predictions. FE models of various human body regions including the lower extremities, abdomen, pelvis, thorax, neck, and head have been generated as well as full body models such as total human model for safety and global human body models consortium [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. However, to this end, a noticeable gap exists in the understanding of injury thresholds for these soft tissues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, there has been much progress in the development of FE models for impact and injury predictions. FE models of various human body regions including the lower extremities, abdomen, pelvis, thorax, neck, and head have been generated as well as full body models such as total human model for safety and global human body models consortium [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. However, to this end, a noticeable gap exists in the understanding of injury thresholds for these soft tissues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…THUMS includes bones, ligaments, muscles, skin, brain, and internal organs such as lung and liver, and can be used for the injury estimation of each organ. The model was validated against 36 series of cadaveric or volunteer test data of the human body responses for frontal, side, and rear impacts, and the results showed good agreement with the test data (4) (5) . In addition, the THUMS includes 262 muscle bar elements modeled by Hill type muscle contractile material properties, and can reproduce the driver's muscle activation conditions by inputting the activation time history curves to individual muscles of the entire body (4) .…”
Section: Human Body Fe Modelmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To date, a plethora of surrogate models exist for soft tissues such as the calcaneal heel pad [19,20], which have been characterized using indentation systems (measuring external load–deformation responses) [20], imaging (for internal strain measurements) [21], and experienced palpatory testing [22]. These surrogates have been used in anthropomorphic test devices for the study of injury risks associated with the lower extremity due to blast loading [14,19,23,24] and high impact loadings sustained in vehicular crashes [25,26]. Also, surrogate models have been employed in several studies to characterize the effect of personal protection equipment [27], and orthotic interventions for injury prevention [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%