2022
DOI: 10.2196/35067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of the Adolescent Media Health Literacy Scales: Rasch Measurement Model Approach

Abstract: Background High media use has been implicated in negative social and health outcomes among adolescents. Therefore, it is critical that adolescents develop skills to healthily engage with media content. Media health literacy (MHL), skills for assessing and responding to health-related media content, and potentially targetable moderators for the relationship between media use and health-related outcomes are understudied in adolescents. The lack of MHL assessment tools may have contributed to this res… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The models were re-estimated and fit statistics were reviewed after each item removal. As proposed by Linacre ( 28 ) and done in other studies ( 29 , 30 ), person misfit considerations included removing one round of the most misfitting responses, re-estimating the model, and comparing the fit statistics of the modified and original responses. If the modified responses improved model fit, then the modified dataset was retained and final analyses were conducted on this dataset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The models were re-estimated and fit statistics were reviewed after each item removal. As proposed by Linacre ( 28 ) and done in other studies ( 29 , 30 ), person misfit considerations included removing one round of the most misfitting responses, re-estimating the model, and comparing the fit statistics of the modified and original responses. If the modified responses improved model fit, then the modified dataset was retained and final analyses were conducted on this dataset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Below Basic (scores 0-7), Basic (scores 8-15), Intermediate (scores 16-23), Pro cient (scores 24-29), and Advanced (scores [30][31][32]. The score range was larger than the number of items due to items with polytomous response options.…”
Section: Assumptions Of Unidimensionality (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Self-report on general HL skills 2. self-report on media literacy skills and motivation 3. understand medical language 4. find information on a health website 5. understand a doctor's interview 6. understand symbols related to healthcare, the healthcare system 7. appraise online health information for reliability 8. correctly complete the nutrition triangle 9. name medical professions and identify the purpose for consultation (knowledge of the healthcare system) 10. interpret a patient package insert (apply the information) 11. answer questions about a nutrition label (apply the information) 12. interpret a health graph 13. interpret a table on recommended daily amounts of vitamins (apply the information) 14. a calculation task on health figures (apply the information)…”
Section: The Instrument and Its Construct Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2006, Baker [10] distinguished between health-related print literacy and health-related oral literacy, which were both fed by health-related reading fluency, health-related vocabulary, and familiarity with health concepts. Fleary [11], more recently, has emphasized the critical engagement with health-related (digital) media content as a subskill of HL. Indeed, in some (leading) countries, HL as a concept is now starting to move away from a small focus on literacy for the management of one's disease in healthcare settings to a much broader conceptualization, including generic skills and competences to deal with any health-related information in critical ways to the benefit of disease prevention and health promotion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation