2014
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT)

Abstract: BackgroundExisting risk stratification tools have limitations and clinical experience suggests they are not used routinely. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a preoperative risk stratification tool to predict 30-day mortality after non-cardiac surgery in adults by analysis of data from the observational National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) Knowing the Risk study.MethodsThe data set was split into derivation and validation cohorts. Logistic regression was used to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
215
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
215
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar modeling approach has been met with success across surgical specialties and within the category of spine surgery. [18][19][20] For instance, a recently developed spinal risk stratification tool, SpineSage (http://depts.washington.edu/ spinersk/), was partly derived from prospective research assessing postoperative SSI risk. 18,20 Therefore, thorough statistical analysis of large surgical registries can inform further studies on perioperative management tailored to patients' specific constellations of risk factors both to manage complications in high-risk patients but also reduce redundant care in low-risk patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar modeling approach has been met with success across surgical specialties and within the category of spine surgery. [18][19][20] For instance, a recently developed spinal risk stratification tool, SpineSage (http://depts.washington.edu/ spinersk/), was partly derived from prospective research assessing postoperative SSI risk. 18,20 Therefore, thorough statistical analysis of large surgical registries can inform further studies on perioperative management tailored to patients' specific constellations of risk factors both to manage complications in high-risk patients but also reduce redundant care in low-risk patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But do we have clinical tools to accurately estimate early mortality in this particular population? Table 2 shows some surgical risk scores frequently used in the general population, which could be applied in elderly waitlisted patients, showing the clinical information necessary for inclusion on the list and, thus, to calculate the risk [73-78]. Although these risk indices are not universally applied in daily clinical transplant practice, efforts should made to apply those indices involving renal impairment, especially when assessing death risk in elderly patients before performing KT.…”
Section: Assessment Of Perioperative Risk In Elderly Candidates For Ktmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our Patient B would have a moderate-high risk of early death post-transplantation (Table 3). Finally, the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT score) includes age, comorbidities and the ASA classification (www.ncepod.org.uk) [78]. Again, our Patient A would have an intermediate and manageable perioperative risk whereas our Patient B would have a high mortality risk.…”
Section: Assessment Of Perioperative Risk In Elderly Candidates For Ktmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there are a number of cost grouping models besides HRG and CMS-HCC, which are more detailed, like Bupa Operative Severity Score [37] and Surgical Outcome Risk Tool [38].…”
Section: B Operations and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%