2017
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20160168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale – Brazilian version

Abstract: Objective: This article aims to describe the adaptation and translation process of the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) and its reduced version, the Bush-Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument (BFCSI) for Brazilian Portuguese, as well as its validation. Methods: Semantic equivalence processes included four steps: translation, back translation, evaluation of semantic equivalence and a pilot-study. Validation consisted of simultaneous applications of the instrument in Portuguese by two examiners in 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We preffered the Brazilian version due to appropriate methodolgy of the article. According to this form of scale, maximum score is 69 and mean is 20.07) [9]. Physical examination of other systems were unremarkable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We preffered the Brazilian version due to appropriate methodolgy of the article. According to this form of scale, maximum score is 69 and mean is 20.07) [9]. Physical examination of other systems were unremarkable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), designed in 1996 by Bush et al, is currently the most preferred method for diagnosing catatonia due to its five-minute administration time, reliability, and validity [8,9]. Two versions of the BFCRS exist, an extended one, which consists of 23 items rated on a scale from 0 to 3, and a shortened one consisting of only the first 14 items expressed in the extended version [10].…”
Section: Diagnostic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other scales used to diagnose catatonia include the Modified Rogers Catatonia Scale, Rogers Catatonia Scale, a revision of the BFCRS proposed by Ungvari, Northoff Catatonia Rating Scale, Braunig Catatonia Rating Scale, and the Kanner Scale [10,11]. No laboratory tests that define catatonia exist [11].…”
Section: Diagnostic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three subtypes: retarded, excited, and malignant. The retarded type is described as having an inability to move, staring, posturing, negativism, and mutism [5]. For centuries, schizophrenia has been divided into two different groups: catatonia group and non-catatonia group [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lorazepam challenge is one of the major forms of diagnosing patients with catatonia. A patient is given 1-2 mg of lorazepam intramuscularly, intravenously, or orally and observed for rapid resolution of symptoms after a 20 to 30-minute time period [5]. Yet, without proper anticoagulation, patients with catatonia and DVTs on the lorazepam challenge can quickly develop pulmonary emboli which can lead to their demise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%