2006
DOI: 10.1017/s1041610206003504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory

Abstract: Background:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

24
585
5
22

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 651 publications
(637 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
24
585
5
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicative of greater anxiety severity. Findings from previous studies provide evidence for excellent GAI score test-retest reliability (r = 0.93 and 0.91) and excellent internal consistency [18,23]. We examined the psychometric properties of the GAI and found good internal consistency as measured with the Kuder-Richardson 20 coefficient (KR-20 = 0.82).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicative of greater anxiety severity. Findings from previous studies provide evidence for excellent GAI score test-retest reliability (r = 0.93 and 0.91) and excellent internal consistency [18,23]. We examined the psychometric properties of the GAI and found good internal consistency as measured with the Kuder-Richardson 20 coefficient (KR-20 = 0.82).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We examined the psychometric properties of the GAI and found good internal consistency as measured with the Kuder-Richardson 20 coefficient (KR-20 = 0.82). Additional studies provide evidence of convergent validity [18,[23][24] and discriminant validity [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is only very recently that instruments devised specifically to measure anxiety and anxiety disorders among older people have been developed and tested. Prominent examples are the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI, Pachana et al, 2007) and the Geriatric Anxiety Scale (GAS, Segal et al, 2010). Both instruments are put to the test in this issue and both perform very well (Mueller et al, 2015, Johnco et al, 2015.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%