OBJECTIVE -To compare the health service utilization and long-term outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with and without diabetes in Ontario.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -We examined 25,697 patients from Ontario (6,052 and 19,645 patients with and without diabetes, respectively) who were hospitalized because of AMI between 1 April 1992 and 31 December 1993. Using linked administrative databases, we determined the use of invasive cardiac procedures at 1 year as well as the intensity of specialty follow-up care and use of evidence-based pharmacotherapies (among elderly individuals) within the first 90 days of hospital discharge. Outcomes examined included mortality and recurrent cardiac admissions at 30 days and 5 years post AMI. Multivariable analyses adjusted for sociodemographic and case-mix characteristics, attending physician specialty, and admitting hospital characteristics.RESULTS -Despite being at significantly higher risk for death at baseline, diabetic patients were less likely to be followed-up by a cardiologist (22.2 vs. 25.6%, P Ͻ 0.001), to receive myocardial revascularization (12.6 vs. 14.9%, P Ͻ 0.001), to receive -blockers (34.2 vs. 44.0%, P Ͻ 0.001), and to receive aspirin therapy (59.7 vs. 63.5%, P Ͻ 0.001) after AMI than their nondiabetic counterparts. Diabetes was an important independent predictor of 5-year morbidity (adjusted hazard ratio 1.52, 95% CI 1.45-1.59) and 5-year mortality outcomes (1.57, 1.50 -1.63). Variations in processes of care were marginally associated with higher nonfatal complication rates for diabetic patients.CONCLUSIONS -When managing AMI patients with diabetes in Ontario, physician treatment aggressiveness does not correspond appropriately to the baseline risk of patients.
Diabetes Care 26:1427-1434, 2003T here are ϳ2 million people (6% of the total population) who are affected by diabetes in Canada (1). The impact of diabetes on the mortality of a population is significant. Researchers have estimated that at least 5.2% of cardiovascular adult deaths and 3.6% of all adult deaths in the U.S. are attributable to diabetes (2). The deleterious pathophysiologic effects of diabetes seem to operate both before and after an index ischemic cardiovascular event (3-5). Among patients with acute coronary syndromes, the increase in mortality risk associated with diabetes is of similar magnitude to that of previous myocardial infarction (5,6).Notwithstanding the importance of biological and clinical factors, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) outcome studies have demonstrated that the use of evidence-based pharmacotherapies and the intensity of specialty cardiac care after discharge from the index AMI may positively impact long-term outcomes (7). One might hypothesize that if physicians appropriately attune themselves to the risk profiles of their patients, then cardiovascular management strategies should be more intensive among diabetic patients, given that baseline risks are what drive the treatment-outcome benefits within a population (8). However, available evid...