Development and validation of the Nurse’s Workplace Mental Health Questionnaire

Lai, Jin; Zhang, Rong; Hong, Miaoxuan; Li, Nanyan

doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.09.004

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…29,30 For Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), a minimum sample size of 5 to 10 times the number of inventory items is recommended, accounting for a 20% invalid response rate, requiring at least 200 samples. 31 Con rmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) also requires a minimum sample size of 200, following structural equation modeling requirements. 31 Additionally, for test-retest reliability assessment, a sample size of 30 is needed, with retesting expected 2 to 4 weeks after the initial survey.…”

Section: Sample Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

“…31 Con rmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) also requires a minimum sample size of 200, following structural equation modeling requirements. 31 Additionally, for test-retest reliability assessment, a sample size of 30 is needed, with retesting expected 2 to 4 weeks after the initial survey. Therefore, a minimum sample size of 400 is required for this study.…”

Section: Sample Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Construct validity is veri ed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and con rmatory factor analysis (CFA). 31 When KMO > 0.70 and Bartlett's test is signi cant (P < 0.05), CFA is considered appropriate. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Maximum Variance Orthogonal Rotation were used to assess the internal structure of the Chinese version of VPTGI.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

RETRACTED: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Reliability of the Inventory of Vicarious Posttraumatic Growth and research of its influencing factors: A Cross-Sectional Study

Cai,

Li,

Zou

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The purpose of this study was to translate the Vicarious Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (VPTGI) into Chinese and to assess its reliability and validity in Nurses, Additionally, it explored the correlations between vicarious posttraumatic growth (VPTG), Secondary Traumatic Stress (STS) and demographic variables. Methods The Brislin translation model was used to translate the VPTGI into Chinese. Validity analysis involved exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and assessments of convergent validity, discriminant validity, and content validity. Reliability analysis included split-half reliability, internal consistency reliability, and test-retest reliability. Item analysis employed the Critical Ratio Decision Value (CR) method, item-total correlation method, and reliability change method. Single-factor analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between demographic variables and VPTG, while correlation analysis explored the association between STS and VPTG. Results The Chinese version VPTGI demonstrated robust content validity (I-CVI: 0.83-1, S-CVI: 0.97), supported by EFA (KMO: 0.933) and significant Bartlett's test (p < 0.001). Four factors explained 67.82% variance, CFA confirmed the model fit (χ2/df = 2.255, RMSEA = 0.079, IFI = 0.931, TLI = 0.914, CFI = 0.930, NFI = 0.882). The Chinese version VPTGI demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.951), with dimensions' Cronbach's α ranging from 0.806 to 0.912. Overall, nurses demonstrated a moderate to low level of VPTG and a severe level of STS. Furthermore, there was a significant negative correlation between STS and VPTG. Conclusion The Chinese version of VPTGI demonstrated satisfactory reliability, validity, and factor structure, making it a reliable tool to assess VPTG in Chinese nurses. These findings underscore the importance of promoting VPTG and addressing STS among healthcare professionals. Further research in this area is warranted to better understand and support the psychological well-being of nurses.

show abstract

Section: Sample Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sample Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

RETRACTED: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Reliability of the Inventory of Vicarious Posttraumatic Growth and research of its influencing factors: A Cross-Sectional Study

Cai,

Li,

Zou

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The sample size used for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was 5–10 times of the items. 22 , 23 The sample size was increased by 20% to allow for a drop out rate, 24 and final sample size was 264. The sample size of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) required ≥ 200 cases.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation and validation study of the Chinese version of the service user technology acceptability questionnaire

Cheng¹,

Zhao²,

Li³

et al. 2023

Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Using self-acceptance questionnaires requires proper instrument development and validation (Bergemann, 1988;Lai et al, 2022). The scale in measuring self-acceptance must be valid and reliable to produce instruments that can be used in education.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Validity and Reliability of Self-Acceptance Scale Using Rasch Model

Gunawan,

Dodi Suryana,

Hyunisa Rahmanadia

2023

j. pendidik.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The measurement of self-acceptance in previous studies still uses classical methods. A valid and reliable self-acceptance scale will help measure the ability to recognize, accept oneself for uniqueness. This study aims to validate and develop the Self-Acceptance Scale. This study was conducted on 100 high school students in Lembang, West Java Province, which included 58 females and 42 males. Cross-sectional survey research methods and a quantitative methodology were employed in this study. The Rasch Model was utilized for data analysis with the Win steps 3.73 program. The findings indicated that 25 items and four scale alternatives where The Cronbach Alpha value represents the interaction between Person and Item is in the excellent category with a value of 0.56. A person's reliability is in a suitable category with a value of 0.47, which indicates the consistency of respondents' answers. The scale meets the criteria that can be used to measure student self-acceptance.

show abstract

Development and validation of the Nurse’s Workplace Mental Health Questionnaire

Cited by 4 publications

References 36 publications

RETRACTED: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Reliability of the Inventory of Vicarious Posttraumatic Growth and research of its influencing factors: A Cross-Sectional Study

RETRACTED: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Reliability of the Inventory of Vicarious Posttraumatic Growth and research of its influencing factors: A Cross-Sectional Study

Translation and validation study of the Chinese version of the service user technology acceptability questionnaire

Analysis of Validity and Reliability of Self-Acceptance Scale Using Rasch Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About