2014
DOI: 10.7468/mathedu.2014.53.2.185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of the Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Scale: Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The STEM disciplines (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics), Shulman's model of PCK, and theoretical knowledge were used as a basis for the STEMPCK Scale, and items were written based on extensive review of the literature (e.g., Aksu et al, 2014;Bukova-Güzel et al, 2013;Brenneman, 2011;Campbell et al, 2010;Enochs et al, 2000;Faber et al, 2013;Kelleys & Knowles, 2016;Kiray, 2016;Kloosterman & Stage, 1992;Koehler et al, 2011;Önal, 2016;Ryang, 2014;Schmidt et al, 2009;Unfried et al, 2015;Viiri, 2003;Yusof et al, 2012) and interviews. The results of the varimax analyses shaped the factors in the STEMPCK Scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The STEM disciplines (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics), Shulman's model of PCK, and theoretical knowledge were used as a basis for the STEMPCK Scale, and items were written based on extensive review of the literature (e.g., Aksu et al, 2014;Bukova-Güzel et al, 2013;Brenneman, 2011;Campbell et al, 2010;Enochs et al, 2000;Faber et al, 2013;Kelleys & Knowles, 2016;Kiray, 2016;Kloosterman & Stage, 1992;Koehler et al, 2011;Önal, 2016;Ryang, 2014;Schmidt et al, 2009;Unfried et al, 2015;Viiri, 2003;Yusof et al, 2012) and interviews. The results of the varimax analyses shaped the factors in the STEMPCK Scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The STEM disciplines (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics), Shulman's model of PCK, and theoretical knowledge were used as a basis for the STEMPCK Scale, and items were written based on extensive review of the literature (e.g., Aksu et al, 2014;Bukova-Güzel et al, 2013;Brenneman, 2011;Campbell et al, 2010;Enochs et al, 2000;Faber et al, 2013;Kelleys & Knowles, 2016;Kiray, 2016;Kloosterman & Stage, 1992;Koehler et al, 2011;Önal, 2016;Ryang, 2014;Schmidt et al, 2009;Unfried et al, 2015;Viiri, 2003;Yusof et al, 2012) Additionally, based on the confirmatory factor analysis results, the CFI, GFI, IFI, NFI, and AGFI values were higher than 0.90, indicating that model-data fit was high (Hooper et al, 2008;Sümer, 2000). In addition, the SRMR and RMSEA values (0.043 and 0.034, respectively) were less than 0.05, indicating that model-data fit was high (Anderson & Gerbing, 1984;Hooper et al, 2008;Jöreskog & Sörbom, 1993;Sümer, 2000;Hu & Bentler, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the scale was developed, an extensive review of the literature was conducted. This literature review included studies focused on the STEM disciplines; teaching the STEM disciplines; and scales to determine teachers' PCK, technological PCK, and engineering PCK (e.g., Aksu, Metin, & Konyalıoğlu, 2014;Bukova-Güzel et al, 2013;Brenneman, 2011;Campbell, Abd-Hamid, & Chapman, 2010;Enochs, Smith, & Huinker, 2000;Faber et al, 2013;Halim, Mohd Meerah, Zakaria, Syed Abdullah, & Tambychik, 2012;Kelleys & Knowles, 2016;Kiray, 2016;Kloosterman & Stage, 1992;Koehler et al, 2011;Önal, 2016;Ryang, 2014;Schmidt et al, 2009;Unfried, Faber, Stanhope, & Wiebe, 2015;Viiri, 2003;Yıldırım & Selvi, 2015, Yusof et al, 2012.…”
Section: Development Of the Stempck Scalementioning
confidence: 99%