2010
DOI: 10.1118/1.3276777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of segmentation and interpolation techniques in sinograms for metal artifact suppression in CT

Abstract: The new artifact suppression design is efficient, for instance, in terms of preserving spatial resolution, as it is applied directly to original raw data. It successfully reduced artifacts in CT images of five patients and in phantom images. Sophisticated interpolation methods are needed to obtain reliable HU values close to the prosthesis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
86
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are three classes of metal artifact reduction methods: sinogram in-painting [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], iterative reconstruction [8][9][10], and energy decomposition [11][12][13]. Iterative reconstruction requires accurate modeling of the X-ray generation and attenuation processes, which is difficult to accomplish.…”
Section: B Current Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are three classes of metal artifact reduction methods: sinogram in-painting [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], iterative reconstruction [8][9][10], and energy decomposition [11][12][13]. Iterative reconstruction requires accurate modeling of the X-ray generation and attenuation processes, which is difficult to accomplish.…”
Section: B Current Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some methods [1][2][3][4][5][6], metal objects are located in the original image by thresholding, and the traces are located by calculation. In other methods [7], the metal traces are located directly in projections. Early work [1,2] interpolated the projection data on either side of the traces.…”
Section: B Current Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent work by Yu et al [34] does the metal segmentation directly in the projections. Veldkamp et al [30] applies a complex segmentation strategy in projection space. Three interpolation methods are investigated.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the projection completion approach, which is often followed by filtered-back-projection (FBP) image reconstruction, the missing projections are synthesized from neighboring projections using linear and polynomial interpolation [4], [8]- [10], wavelet interpolation [11], adaptive filtering [12], [13], and inpainting [14]- [17] techniques. Other approaches aim at replacing the missing projections with those available in opposite view angles or adjacent CT slices [18]- [20] or the projections obtained from forward projection of tissue-segmented CT images [21]- [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, projection completion algorithms should be preceded by a metal trace identification step, in which projections running through metallic implants (i.e., corrupted or missing projections) are identified. This is achieved by either 1) segmentation of CT images for metallic implants and forward projection of the resulting metal-only image into an artificial sinogram domain [4], [26], [27], or 2) direct segmentation of raw sinogram data for corrupted projections [10], [13], [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%