2015
DOI: 10.1111/jphs.12119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of RhMAT, as medication assessment tool specifically designed for rheumatoid arthritis management

Abstract: Objectives The implementation of individualised pharmaceutical care plans based on the identification of pharmaceutical care issues for rheumatoid arthritis patients presenting at outpatient clinic service has been proven to be effective in improving the quality of life of these patients. However, the identification and classification of pharmaceutical care issues into drug therapy problems does not give room to assessment of prescribing trends and adherence to international guidelines. The novel concept of me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Review criteria defining appropriate drug therapy were constructed as a ‘qualifying statement’ followed by a ‘standard’, based on the format of previously published MATs. 14 - 21 For example, ‘patient with atrial fibrillation who has a CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score of ≥1 (≥2 if female)’ is the qualifying statement and ‘is prescribed warfarin (INR 2.0-3.0) or other oral anticoagulant’ is the standard. Response options include ‘not applicable’ when the criterion is not applicable, ‘yes’ for adherence, ‘no’ for non-adherence and ‘justified no’ when there is a justified reason for non-adherence to the standard.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Review criteria defining appropriate drug therapy were constructed as a ‘qualifying statement’ followed by a ‘standard’, based on the format of previously published MATs. 14 - 21 For example, ‘patient with atrial fibrillation who has a CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score of ≥1 (≥2 if female)’ is the qualifying statement and ‘is prescribed warfarin (INR 2.0-3.0) or other oral anticoagulant’ is the standard. Response options include ‘not applicable’ when the criterion is not applicable, ‘yes’ for adherence, ‘no’ for non-adherence and ‘justified no’ when there is a justified reason for non-adherence to the standard.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 13 Medication assessment tools (MATs) are disease-specific, evidence-based instruments designed to assess appropriateness of drug therapy and have been developed and applied in various diseases including heart failure, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, cancer pain, asthma, pneumonia and rheumatoid arthritis. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 A MAT that is specific for AF, taking into consideration different management strategies, concurrent multiple morbidities and monitoring for safe use of therapeutic agents, provides an assessment of appropriateness of drug therapy for this disease state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drug utilisation review tools are generally categorised as implicit or explicit, the former considered as more patient‐specific and the latter as more drug or disease‐oriented . Medication assessment tools (MATs) offer a hybrid of these two categories with the advantage of being specific to the patient, disease state and drug therapy . MAT‐CVA is a tool for the secondary prevention of stroke in older persons previously developed by the research group and comprises criteria to assess appropriateness of drug therapy (refer to Table ) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13,14] Medication assessment tools (MATs) offer a hybrid of these two categories with the advantage of being specific to the patient, disease state and drug therapy. [15][16][17][18][19] MAT-CVA is a tool for the secondary prevention of stroke in older persons previously developed by the research group and comprises criteria to assess appropriateness of drug therapy (refer to Table S1). [20] Criteria consist of two components, a qualifying statement and a standard, sectioned into antithrombotic, lipid-lowering, antihypertensive and glycaemic therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%