2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.net.2019.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of reactor nuclear design code CORCA-3D

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a classical computational setting, numerical models discretize the governing equations, approximating the solution fields in different ways. For example, the finite element method builds the field using an expansion in a finite number of basis functions and the finite difference method builds the field at a set of discrete points in the space-time domain, while for the proprietary code packages such as CORCA-3D [23] and COCAGNE [24], different nodal methods are used which represent the field with node average value followed by pin power reconstruction in each node. Whichever numerical method is chosen, the result is a numerical model that embeds governing equations.…”
Section: Numerical Approximation Of Physical Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In a classical computational setting, numerical models discretize the governing equations, approximating the solution fields in different ways. For example, the finite element method builds the field using an expansion in a finite number of basis functions and the finite difference method builds the field at a set of discrete points in the space-time domain, while for the proprietary code packages such as CORCA-3D [23] and COCAGNE [24], different nodal methods are used which represent the field with node average value followed by pin power reconstruction in each node. Whichever numerical method is chosen, the result is a numerical model that embeds governing equations.…”
Section: Numerical Approximation Of Physical Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whichever numerical method is chosen, the result is a numerical model that embeds governing equations. For practical nuclear engineering applications, the dimensionality of these numerical models is typically high, e.g., in the range of thousands to millions of unknowns, or even more in three-dimensional time-varying simulations [23,24,7]. This means that a large-scale system of equations has to be solved to evaluate the physical model, which presents computational challenge in simulations requiring i) many-queries e.g., optimal control, inverse problems, uncertainty quantification etc., ii) real-time evaluations e.g., online monitoring, parameter estimation, etc.…”
Section: Numerical Approximation Of Physical Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a classical computational setting, numerical models discrete the governing equations, approximating the solution fields in different ways. The current mature industrial standard codes use different nodal methods to represent the field with node average value followed by pin power reconstruction in each node, such as CORCA-3D [2], COCAGNE [17], SIMULATE-5 [9], ANC9 [14], PARCS [30], DONJON4 [39], DYN3D [10], SCOPE2 [72], Bamboo-Core [77], DIF3D-VARIANT [68] etc. The typical computational time for one simulation of the whole core amounts to 30 seconds as reported in [4].…”
Section: Neutron Field Modeling and Simulation Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%