2017
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of Quality Criteria for Providing Patient- and Family-centered Injury Care

Abstract: Fourteen-candidate quality criteria for patient- and family-centered injury care were developed and shown to have content validity. These may be used to guide quality improvement practices.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Contemporary trends such as patient- and family-centered care or cost may be may also be converted to morbidity indicators such as family and patient related changes in stress, mental health, financial status, and family functioning. 5 …”
Section: What Is Morbidity?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Contemporary trends such as patient- and family-centered care or cost may be may also be converted to morbidity indicators such as family and patient related changes in stress, mental health, financial status, and family functioning. 5 …”
Section: What Is Morbidity?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allows for similar concepts to be brought together. However, panellists’ must be cognizant to avoid developing a concept that is too broad or vague (ie, too many dimensions) and subsequently hard to act on . In a qualitative analysis of a consensus process to develop quality indicators of injury care, Bobrovitz et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assembled a panel of nine individuals representing providers (n=3), decision makers (n=3) and patients’ families (n=3) from ICUs within a single geographically defined health‐care system (Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada) responsible for providing integrated health‐care services to a population of 4.2 million residents . We elected to comprise the panel equally of these three stakeholder groups given our perspective that each group is equally important for health‐care quality (delivering care, overseeing care delivery, receiving care) . Panellists were purposively nominated by the leadership of the health‐care system's Critical Care Strategic Clinical Network (CCSCN), a province‐wide network of critical care medicine stakeholders to ensure representation of different experiences, expertise and geographical locations (Table ) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations