Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.2147/clep.s151339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of novel algorithms to identify patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in Israel: an epi-IIRN group study

Abstract: BackgroundBefore embarking on administrative research, validated case ascertainment algorithms must be developed. We aimed at developing algorithms for identifying inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, date of disease onset, and IBD type (Crohn’s disease [CD] vs ulcerative colitis [UC]) in the databases of the four Israeli Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) covering 98% of the population.MethodsAlgorithms were developed on 5,131 IBD patients and 2,072 controls, following independent chart review (60%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using these definitions, we observed PPVs of 97% for prevalent Crohn's disease and 98% for prevalent ulcerative colitis. The observed level of accuracy for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis is higher than among most previous reports [6,9,[19][20][21][22][23]. However, this difference is partly explained by differences in study design, as we included patients with known IBD who were treated with biologics and not a random subset of patients with IBD-associated ICD-codes in a national or regional register.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Using these definitions, we observed PPVs of 97% for prevalent Crohn's disease and 98% for prevalent ulcerative colitis. The observed level of accuracy for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis is higher than among most previous reports [6,9,[19][20][21][22][23]. However, this difference is partly explained by differences in study design, as we included patients with known IBD who were treated with biologics and not a random subset of patients with IBD-associated ICD-codes in a national or regional register.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Diagnoses and medical fields were obtained through the chronic diseases registry, which has been previously validated by the developers of its algorithms, 13 as well as by many other authors utilizing the database. 14–17 The establishment of the computerized systems was initiated in 2000 and is continuously updated with clinical information. The extraction of the current database, containing schizophrenia patients and their matched controlled cases, was originally mined at the end of 2017.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, we are confident that the combined use of three different sources of administrative databases of the Friuli Venezia Giulia regionwhich have served as sources for several published research articles [41][42][43]-have allowed reaching a large group of IBD patients with different types of access to health services. Indeed, hospital discharge records have been largely used in many studies for IBD case ascertainment [44][45][46] while inclusion of medical exemptions has been effectively used in previous studies on IBD or other chronic conditions [45,47]. Furthermore, pathological archives were included in a recent investigation [48].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%