2018
DOI: 10.29252/edcj.11.29.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of Instruments for Evaluation of the Clinical Medicine Curriculum in Terms of Social Accountability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 15 Development and Validation of Instruments for Evaluation of the Clinical Medicine Curriculum in Terms of Social Accountability Adib, Y. et al. 31 2018 Development of tool/inventory Mixed Methods Iran (Islamic Republic of) Aspects of the clinical medicine curriculum were selected based on social accountability. 16 Development and evaluation of an online course about the social accountability of medical schools Abdalla, M.E.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 15 Development and Validation of Instruments for Evaluation of the Clinical Medicine Curriculum in Terms of Social Accountability Adib, Y. et al. 31 2018 Development of tool/inventory Mixed Methods Iran (Islamic Republic of) Aspects of the clinical medicine curriculum were selected based on social accountability. 16 Development and evaluation of an online course about the social accountability of medical schools Abdalla, M.E.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The twenty-six studies included in the review were from seven countries (Iran, Sudan, KSA, United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Morocco, and Pakistan) out of the 22 countries constituting the WHO's EM region. Seventy-three percent of the articles were published in two countries; 13 (50.00%) studies were from Iran, 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 six (23.08%) were from Sudan, 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 40 two were from KSA, 21 , 41 two were from the United Arab Emirates, 20 , 42 and the other three countries contributed one article each 43 , 44 , 45 ( Table 2 ). The thirteen studies from Iran came from five different medical schools, while the six studies from Sudan came from one medical school: the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Gezira (FMUOG).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%