Development and validation of IMPACT-S, an ICF-based questionnaire to measure activities and participation.

Post, Marcel W.M.; Witte, Luc de; Reichrath, Enid; Verdonschot, Manon M. L.; Wijlhuizen, G.J.; Perenboom, R.J.M.

doi:10.2340/16501977-0223

Cited by 102 publications

(75 citation statements)

References 25 publications

(38 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Respondents had reported the fewest problems with "Understanding and communication," which fully coincides with other WHODAS II questionnaire studies involving people with spinal cord injury [5,6,8]. The results from Latvian respondents in all domains and the evaluation of the overall level of functioning were several points higher than has been the case in studies conducted in other countries, which suggests that people with spinal cord injuries in Latvia evaluate their level of functioning lower than people in other countries do.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 56%

The World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Scale (WHODAS II): Links between self-rated health and objectively defined and clinical parameters in the population of spinal cord injury

Steinerte

Vētra

2016

SHS Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. There are many clinical and objectively defined parameters that are used to evaluate a person's disability. Since the World Health Organisation has presented the WHODAS II as a means of objectively measuring subjectively defined functions, greater attention has been focused on self-rated health. Only a few studies, however, have been conducted about differences between self-rated health and objectively defined parameters. The survey for this study was conducted on the basis of WHODAS II and the population in Latvia with spinal cord injury. Respondents were between 18 and 65, and 98 questionnaires were analysed. The results show that people with spinal cord injury on average rate their functioning as limited (33-40 points of 100). Most respondents have been declared to be disabled, which is defined as very serious or severe functional disorders. More than 40% have paid jobs, while one-third do not work for reasons of health. The research shows that there is a close coherence (p< 0.05) between individual, objectively and clinically defined indicators on the one hand and the aspects of the questionnaire in which physical functioning was an important factor on the other hand. In order to understand the real functional abilities of patients and the individual factors that influence those abilities, it is necessary to define functional self-rated health in addition to objectively defined indicators.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 56%

The World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Scale (WHODAS II): Links between self-rated health and objectively defined and clinical parameters in the population of spinal cord injury

Steinerte

Vētra

2016

SHS Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We included the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF; World Health Organization, 2001) Measure of Participation and Activities (IMPACT) as a measure of activity and participation (Post et al, 2008). This self-report measure contains 33 items in nine different scales assessing the domains of activity and participation as defined by the ICF.…”

Section: Assessmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fear of Falling in People With Chronic Stroke

Schmid

Arnold

Jones

et al. 2015

The American Journal of Occupational Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE. We assessed the prevalence of fear of falling (FoF) in a sample of people with chronic stroke and compared multiple variables (balance, anxiety, depression, activity and participation, and stroke severity) in people with and without FoF. METHOD. This study was a secondary analysis of data collected from a cross-sectional study of mobility after stroke in 77 participants with chronic stroke (>6 mo poststroke). RESULTS. Of the 77 participants, 51 (66%) reported experiencing FoF. People with FoF had significantly decreased balance (p < .001) and activity and participation (p = .006) and significantly increased anxiety (p = .007). People with FoF also had significantly worse stroke severity (p = .001). CONCLUSION. FoF is a prevalent concern in the chronic stroke population. The presence of FoF was associated with a variety of negative consequences. Occupational therapy practitioners should address FoF to help clients manage FoF and possibly improve recovery.

show abstract

“…13,[23][24][25][26] On an operational level, a consensus seems to be emerging to consider the ICF chapters 1-5 to address activities and 7-9 to involve participation. 11,13,21,26 On the assignment of chapter 6 (domestic life) authors diverge, probably because this chapter covers a mixture of activity-type categories, for example, washing the dishes, and role-type categories, for example, parenting. 11,13,26 By including both performance and satisfaction items, the A&P Basic Data Set also fits a trend to include ratings of both performance and satisfaction in participation measures.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…11,13,21,26 On the assignment of chapter 6 (domestic life) authors diverge, probably because this chapter covers a mixture of activity-type categories, for example, washing the dishes, and role-type categories, for example, parenting. 11,13,26 By including both performance and satisfaction items, the A&P Basic Data Set also fits a trend to include ratings of both performance and satisfaction in participation measures. 15,[27][28][29] These two perspectives provide complementary information that is useful in research and clinical practice.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…6 Activities and participation are distinct conceptual entities in the well-known ICF model, but the ICF A&P classification contains a single list of entries with four different options to distinguish between activities and participation (World Health Organization 6 , 234ff). This apparent inconsistency in the model has prompted many empirical and opinion papers on this issue, [10][11][12][13] and it was clear that consensus was not to be expected. Therefore, in the development of the A&P Basic Data Set, a pragmatic approach was chosen, meaning that it would not be necessary to make a choice at all -as long as it was possible to reach consensus on the selection of the most important domains from the list of activity and participation chapters.…”

Section: Conceptualization Of Activities and Participationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development of the International Spinal Cord Injury Activities and Participation Basic Data Set

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Study design: Consensus decision-making process. Objectives: The objective of this study was to develop an International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Activities and Participation (A&P) Basic Data Set. Setting: International working group. Methods: A committee of experts was established to select and define A&P data elements to be included in this data set. A draft data set was developed and posted on the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) and American Spinal Injury Association websites and was also disseminated among appropriate organizations for review. Suggested revisions were considered, and a final version of the A&P Data Set was completed. Results: Consensus was reached to define A&P and to incorporate both performance and satisfaction ratings. Items that were considered core to each A&P domain were selected from two existing questionnaires. Four items measuring activities were selected from the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III to provide basic data on task execution in activities of daily living. Eight items were selected from the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique to provide basic data on the frequency of participation. An additional rating of satisfaction on a three-point scale for each item completes the total of 24 A&P variables. INTRODUCTIONSpinal cord injury (SCI) affects all body functions below the level of the neurological lesion, and people with SCI may therefore experience a wide range of impairments in body functions, activities and participation and quality of life. 1,2 The typical spectrum of activity limitations and participation restrictions relates to mobility such as transfers and locomotion, self-care activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting, difficulties in regaining employment, maintaining social relationships, participating in leisure activities and being active members of the community. 3,4 The social, economical and psychological consequences for an individual with SCI are significant and usually lifelong and are the result of a complex interaction of factors, including, but not limited to, acute neurological recovery, medical intervention and support from rehabilitation and social reintegration services. 3 To facilitate comparisons regarding injuries, treatments and outcomes between individuals with SCI, treatment centers and countries,

show abstract

Development and validation of IMPACT-S, an ICF-based questionnaire to measure activities and participation.

Abstract: IMPACT-S is a reliable and valid generic measure of activity limitations and participation restrictions that fits the ICF.

Cited by 102 publications

References 25 publications

The World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Scale (WHODAS II): Links between self-rated health and objectively defined and clinical parameters in the population of spinal cord injury

The World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Scale (WHODAS II): Links between self-rated health and objectively defined and clinical parameters in the population of spinal cord injury

Fear of Falling in People With Chronic Stroke

Development of the International Spinal Cord Injury Activities and Participation Basic Data Set

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About