2020
DOI: 10.1556/1326.2020.00753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of GC/MS method for simultaneous determination of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in pork meat matrix

Abstract: Abstract The major processes for introducing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in food are smoking and grilling of different products. But in addition, PAHs can permeate in the food chain due to their high lipophilicity and ability to be accumulated in specific tissue, through contaminated animal feed. Further, when some parts of these animals are marketed as food, the accumulated PAHs can go to the human organism. Some of them are classified as highly toxic, carc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two different studies were developed recently by Givechev et al [ 47 ] and Hung et al [ 15 ] for determination of 16 and 23 PAHs within 30 and 78 min in smoked pork and thin-sliced roasted pork, respectively, with both methods employing a QuEChERS technique, followed by GC–MS (SIM mode) using a SLB-5MS column (30 m × 0.32 mm ID, film thickness 0.25 μm) for the former and GC–MS/MS using a DB-5MS column (15 m × 0.25 mm ID, film thickness 0.25 μm) for the latter with splitless injection. Comparatively, although the former method employed Soxhlet and saponification extraction steps prior to QuEChERS and an internal standard Chrysene-D 12 used for quantification, a lower LOD (0.03–0.3 ng/mL) and LOQ (0.1–0.9 ng/mL) as well as higher recovery (81.2–98.3%) was shown by the latter method with a minimum matrix effect ranging from 1.18 to 1.80 ( Table 2 ), which should be due to the more efficient QuEChERS and higher sensitivity of the GC–MS/MS method [ 15 ].…”
Section: Chromatographic Methods For Pah Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two different studies were developed recently by Givechev et al [ 47 ] and Hung et al [ 15 ] for determination of 16 and 23 PAHs within 30 and 78 min in smoked pork and thin-sliced roasted pork, respectively, with both methods employing a QuEChERS technique, followed by GC–MS (SIM mode) using a SLB-5MS column (30 m × 0.32 mm ID, film thickness 0.25 μm) for the former and GC–MS/MS using a DB-5MS column (15 m × 0.25 mm ID, film thickness 0.25 μm) for the latter with splitless injection. Comparatively, although the former method employed Soxhlet and saponification extraction steps prior to QuEChERS and an internal standard Chrysene-D 12 used for quantification, a lower LOD (0.03–0.3 ng/mL) and LOQ (0.1–0.9 ng/mL) as well as higher recovery (81.2–98.3%) was shown by the latter method with a minimum matrix effect ranging from 1.18 to 1.80 ( Table 2 ), which should be due to the more efficient QuEChERS and higher sensitivity of the GC–MS/MS method [ 15 ].…”
Section: Chromatographic Methods For Pah Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GC is a popular chromatographic technique for PAHs' detection in food matrices since PAHs are thermally stable and the majority are volatile and readily vaporized. PAH analyses using GC are accompanied by detectors such as MS [159,161,[168][169][170][171][172][173], MS/MS [154,[174][175][176], FID [121,160,162,163], or high-resolution MS (HRMS) [57,85,177] Nevertheless, more recent studies tend to utilize MS combined with GC to detect PAHs in food as it offers better method sensitivity, selectivity, and identification abilities compared to FID, and is more convenient and cost-effective than MS/MS and HRMS. In some nations, GC-MS is a component of national standard methods for the determination of PAHs in different food categories (e.g., cereals/cereal products, meats/meat products, and aquatic foods/aquatic food products) [178].…”
Section: Gas Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a class of neutral or non-polar hydrocarbons formed by the linear, angular, or cluster-like linkages of two or more benzene rings [ 1 ]. More than 200 PAHs are widely distributed in various environments [ 2 ], the main sources of which are the incomplete combustion of organic matter such as fossil and biomass fuels [ 3 ] and rock-forming processes [ 4 ]. Due to surface runoff, atmospheric deposition, and wastewater discharge [ 5 ], PAHs are widely distributed in water bodies all over the world, with concentrations ranging from μg/L to ng/L.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%