2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of early warning score system: A systematic literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence suggests that f R is an important marker of clinical deterioration for a variety of pathological conditions in both adults [4,[108][109][110] and children [111]. Indeed, f R is a fundamental variable included in the majority of prognostic scores developed for the prediction of different outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality [4,109,110]. As such, f R contributes to the computation of the most accurate prognostic scores developed so far, such as the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) [4].…”
Section: Current Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence suggests that f R is an important marker of clinical deterioration for a variety of pathological conditions in both adults [4,[108][109][110] and children [111]. Indeed, f R is a fundamental variable included in the majority of prognostic scores developed for the prediction of different outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality [4,109,110]. As such, f R contributes to the computation of the most accurate prognostic scores developed so far, such as the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) [4].…”
Section: Current Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the clinical relevance of f R , this vital sign is often under-recorded [29,37,120,121] or not measured accurately [38,59,60,[122][123][124]. This may impair the efficacy of early warning scores [118,120,121], which also suffer from other methodological issues [109,110]. Therefore, it is imperative to improve the accuracy and frequency of f R monitoring throughout the healthcare chain (pre-hospital, hospital, and post-hospital).…”
Section: Current Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we compared PICTURE's performance to published results for machine learning-based early warning systems using standard criteria to show our model has comparable performance. We compared PICTURE to the following models: one by Alvarez et al [13], the electronic cardiac arrest risk triage (eCART) [26], eCART random forest [9], [14], and the Advanced Alert Monitor [10], which were highlighted in recent literature reviews [1], [16]. Because we could only compare our performance indicators to published performance indicators, this does not allow us to definitively determine which score performs the best.…”
Section: Comparing To Other Early Warning Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic health record (EHR) data has many characteristics (e.g. collection of data for certain treatments) that may bias early warning system development [16] and the missingness pattern may capture these characteristics. Specifically, tree-based machine learning methods have the potential to learn the missingness pattern when using methods such as mean or extreme value imputation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical and physiological measurement data have limited predictive power for early detection of deterioration in hospitalized patients, 1 prompting the search for additional, complementary predictive data sources. Clinicians are continuously engaged in complex decision making and pattern matching, informed by their knowledge and expertise, to drive skilled judgments (eg, prediction of patient trajectories) and subsequent actions (eg, increasing the frequency and type of clinical assessments needed).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%