Development and validation of body fat prediction models in American adults

Abstract

Introduction: Commonly used statistical models to predict body fat percentage currently rely on skinfold measures, anthropometric measures, or some combination of the two but do not account for the wide ranges of age and body mass index (BMI) present in the American adult population. The objective of this study was to develop a statistical regression model to predict in vivo body fat percentage (dual energy Xray) in men and women across significant age and obesity ranges. Methods:This study included 228 adults between the ages of 21 and 70, with BMI between 18.5 and 40.0 kg m −2 . The study population was split into training (n = 163) and validation (n = 65) groups, which were used to develop and validate the prediction models. The models were developed on the training group using a backwards stepwise regression analysis, with the initial predictors including age, BMI, and several anthropometric and skinfold measurements. Results:The final statistical regression models included age, BMI, anthropometric measures, and skinfold measures with significant effects following the stepwise process. The models predicted body fat percentage in the testing group with average errors of less than 0.10% body fat in males and females, while the four previously existing methods (Durnin, Hodgdon, Jackson, and Woolcott) significantly underestimated or overestimated body fat in both genders, with errors ranging between 2% and 10%. Conclusions:The final models included hand thickness, and the female model was dependent on waist circumference and two of the skinfold measures, while the male model used hip and thigh circumferences, along with three skinfold measures. By including the skinfold measurements separately, instead of only as sums like previous models have done, these models can account for the different relative contributions of each site to total body fat.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Obesity among postmenopausal women: what is the best anthropometric index to assess adiposity and success of weight-loss intervention?

“…Finally, given its simplicity and accuracy it was suggested that RFM could be used as a tool of choice to assess adiposity in the general population. 16 Thus, since its publication, the RFM has been frequently cited in the literature and several studies have aimed to validate its usefulness in subpopulations, [17][18][19] suggesting the growing interest to use such an indicator. However, findings from these studies proved to be inconsistent depending on sex, ethnicity, and age subgroups.…”

Muscle wasting assessment tools for prostate cancer

“…We carefully conducted a k -fold cross-validation process to enhance its extension so that the model was independently developed and validated without overfitting. This analytic approach also provides a model performance comparable to what could be observed in a real‐world framework 19 . However, our model would further benefit from external validation by using an independent database.…”

“…The remaining 20% of the sample served as testing data for cross-validation. The rationale of dividing the entire dataset into random training and testing sets is that the predictive model can be independently developed and cross-validated without overfitting, so that the model's performance would be comparable to that observed in a real‐world framework 19 . The final equation performance was further assessed based on bias, precision, and accuracy.…”

A century of skinfolds for body composition estimation: what we learned?

“…It is widely accepted that skinfolds thickness can provide an adequate estimation of body composition 13 . There are hundreds of original studies proposing developed and validated mathematical models to estimate the chemical-molecular or anatomic-tissue component of body adiposity for different ethnicities, age groups, levels of physical activity and/or adverse health conditions such as obesity 14 . These mathematical models are defined as property-based techniques and are classified by functionality derived from statistical analysis of quantitative measures or incorporating relatively constant proportions.…”