2001
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200105001-00953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of an Anxiety Scale for Pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Doyle-Waters study, the correlations between the scores of the state and trait subscales of ASP and the STAI were 0.57 and 0.61, respectively. The correlations between the ASP subscale scores and STAI subscale scores were in the range 0.33 to 0.45 (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Doyle-Waters study, the correlations between the scores of the state and trait subscales of ASP and the STAI were 0.57 and 0.61, respectively. The correlations between the ASP subscale scores and STAI subscale scores were in the range 0.33 to 0.45 (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…All subscales consist of 3 items except attractive factor. Content validity and internal consistency of the ASP have been demonstrated during its initial development (Cronbach α = 0.76) (20).…”
Section: Anxiety Scale For Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Anxiety Scale for Pregnancy (ASP) Doyle Waters developed the Anxiety Scale for Pregnancy (ASP) in 2001 and con rmed its validity and reliability (24). The original version of the ASP contains 14 items (7 items with negative expression and 7 items with positive expression) and 5 factors consisting of baby, labor, marital, attractiveness, and support.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few scales have been developed to measure pregnancy anxiety (4). One of the scales designed to measure pregnancy anxiety is the anxiety scale for pregnancy (ASP) developed by Doyle-Waters et al (18) and then translated and validated into Farsi. The results of the validation study of the Farsi version of the scale indicated that the instrument had acceptable reliability, content validity, predictive validity, discriminative validity, and concurrent validity (19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%