Development and Validation of an Experience-Based Measure of Household Food Insecurity within and across Seasons in Northern Burkina Faso

Abstract

Organizations measure household food insecurity for program design, planning, targeting, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation, but existing measures often are inadequate. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to develop and validate an experienced-based measure of the access component of food insecurity in northern Burkina Faso. In-depth interviews on food insecurity were done with 10 household heads and 26 women using interview guides. We identified themes, classified households, created a table of food insecurity categories, identified items to add to or delete from an initial questionnaire, and developed and revised answer choices. A longitudinal study provided quantitative data on changes over time in household food insecurity, economic situation, and related factors. Data were collected on 126 simple and complex households from 9 villages each July and January from 2001 to 2003 (5 waves). These data allowed examination of changes in household food insecurity twice annually across the best and worst seasons for food, and evaluation of the ability of the experience-based measure to differentiate changes in household food insecurity. Validity was assessed by examining reliability and by comparing the experienced-based food insecurity measure with economic status, dietary, and anthropometric measures and with a measure created by an observer who rated the households' food insecurity. The results provide strong evidence that the food insecurity score, calculated from experience-based questionnaire items, was valid for determining seasonal differences in household food insecurity, differences among households in food insecurity at a given time, and changes in household food insecurity over time in northern rural Burkina Faso.

Food Insecurity Is Associated with Greater Acute Care Utilization among HIV-Infected Homeless and Marginally Housed Individuals in San Francisco

“…35 The HFIAS was initially developed by Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance (FANTA) project based on validation studies in eight countries including the US. 44,45 Validation studies have demonstrated that the HFIAS distinguishes food-secure from -insecure individuals or households across different cultural contexts. The questions cover three domains of the experience of food insecurity: (1) anxiety and uncertainty about food supply, (2) insufficient quality and variety of food, and (3) insufficient food intake and its physical consequences.…”

Gender bias in the food insecurity experience of Ethiopian adolescents

“…Household level food insecurity is measured with a six item scale that was adapted from published food insecurity scales used in developing countries (Coates, Frongillo, Rogers, Webb, Wilde, & Houser, 2006;Frongillo & Nanama, 2006;Melgar-Quinonez, et al, 2006;. The items were included after much discussion with the interviewing team and pilot testing and reflect what appear to be universal expressions of food insecurity .…”

“…These studies use food insecurity scales which capture several dimensions of food insecurity including worry over the adequacy of the food supply, concern about the quality of the food supply, and changes in eating patterns in response to food shortages. Results from a number of developing country studies indicate that these qualitative self-assessments provide valid indicators of food insecurity (Frongillo & Nanama, 2006;Melgar-Quinonez, Zubieta, MkNelly, Nteziyaremye, Gerardo, & Dunford, 2006;.…”

Validation of the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale in rural Tanzania

“…In developing a tool to measure household food insecurity across countries and cultures, researchers have most often either adapted a version of the Cornell/Radimer measuring tool, which was initially developed for use in the USA, or developed a tool based on research on how households experience food insecurity in various countries and geographical areas (5) . Both methods have produced valid or accurate measurements (6)(7)(8) .…”