2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of an instrument to assess the knowledge and perceptions of predatory journals

Sumayyia Marar,
Muaawia A. Hamza,
Mohsen Ayyash
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(115 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the validators will be analyzed using CVR (Content Validity Ratio). The instrument can be maintained where the CVR value ≥ 0.30 (Basirimoghadam et al, 2023;Marar et al, 2023). After improving the instrument based on the advice of the validator, then the instrument is ready for testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the validators will be analyzed using CVR (Content Validity Ratio). The instrument can be maintained where the CVR value ≥ 0.30 (Basirimoghadam et al, 2023;Marar et al, 2023). After improving the instrument based on the advice of the validator, then the instrument is ready for testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…publishers may deceptively claim indexing in reputable databases such as PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus (Marar et al, 2023). Efforts to identify predatory publishers have been initiated, notably by Jeffrey Beall, a University of Colorado Denver librarian, who initially exposed these fraudulent publications.…”
Section: Scholarly Communication Competencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such journals do not tend to uphold the scholarly ethics standards. Predatory journals are defined as "entities that prioritize their interests over scholarly values" (Marar et al, 2023). They are "fraudulent publications characterized by aggressive marketing solicitations and deviation from best publishing practices" (Leducq et al, 2023).…”
Section: Predatory Journalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are "fraudulent publications characterized by aggressive marketing solicitations and deviation from best publishing practices" (Leducq et al, 2023). They "report false or deceptive information, depart from established editorial and publication norms, lack transparency" (Marar et al, 2023). Unfortunately, open access with all its great contribution to Open Science pays dearly for its openness.…”
Section: Predatory Journalsmentioning
confidence: 99%