2017
DOI: 10.1186/s41043-017-0086-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of an Arabic questionnaire to assess psychosocial determinants of eating behavior among adolescents: a cross-sectional study

Abstract: BackgroundThere is a scarcity of studies that evaluate the psychosocial determinants of eating behavior among adolescents in the Eastern Mediterranean region. The availability of such data is limited by the lack of valid culturally appropriate tools. The current study aims to develop and validate an Arabic questionnaire that measures psychosocial determinants of eating behavior among adolescents.MethodsA cross-sectional study was carried out to validate a five-scale questionnaire developed to measure nutrition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The parental version had a somewhat higher Cronbach's alpha value, which can be explained by the fact that the current DKQ was based on a knowledge questionnaire that was originally developed for adults [17]. The internal validity of the current questionnaire is higher compared to previously developed knowledge questionnaires for younger Lebanese children (aged 9-11 years; alpha: 0.66) [25], and for older adolescents (aged 17-18 years; alpha ranged from 0.5 to 0.75) [41].…”
Section: Internal Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The parental version had a somewhat higher Cronbach's alpha value, which can be explained by the fact that the current DKQ was based on a knowledge questionnaire that was originally developed for adults [17]. The internal validity of the current questionnaire is higher compared to previously developed knowledge questionnaires for younger Lebanese children (aged 9-11 years; alpha: 0.66) [25], and for older adolescents (aged 17-18 years; alpha ranged from 0.5 to 0.75) [41].…”
Section: Internal Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…3 Th e scale reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. In an untabulated test, we obtained a score of 0.6, which according to previous studies [53,54], could be considered an acceptable value. In this regard, a lower Cronbach's alpha could be considered suffi cient to indicate consistency for scales with a reduced number of items [55] or in the case of a new scale [56].…”
Section: Task and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Two of the subscales 'disciplinary culture' (teacher questionnaire) and 'institutional culture'(student questionnaire) had low internal consistency in the range of .41and .46, respectively. However, subscale with value less than .40 (Cronbach's α = 0.37) has been retained in a questionnaire if it was unidimensional with fewer number of items [45], which was the case for the two subscales (Tables 4 & 5) in our study. Furthermore, values of Cronbach's alpha less than 0.7 are common for one-dimensional scales with less than 10 items and have been justi ed in the literature [46][47][48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%