2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10753-022-01657-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of an Inflammatory Response-Related Gene Signature for Predicting the Prognosis of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, considering the lack of data on long survival in PC, we compared our risk model with published models on ROC at 1 year, and our model achieved the largest AUC in the data set TCGA-PAAD ( Figure 4I ), achieved the fourth largest AUC in CPTAC ( Supplementary Figure S1A ), and the second in GEO57495 ( Supplementary Figure S1B ). The c-index of our model is 0.70, which is higher than the c-index values of Lin et al (2021) (0.66); Ma et al (2021) (0.63); Zhu et al (2021) (0.66); Xie et al 2022 (0.68); and Deng et al (2022) (0.64) models ( Figure 4J ). The c-index values of our model based on CPTAC and GEO57495 were 0.595 ( Supplementary Figure S1C ) and 0.596 ( Supplementary Figure S1D ), respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next, considering the lack of data on long survival in PC, we compared our risk model with published models on ROC at 1 year, and our model achieved the largest AUC in the data set TCGA-PAAD ( Figure 4I ), achieved the fourth largest AUC in CPTAC ( Supplementary Figure S1A ), and the second in GEO57495 ( Supplementary Figure S1B ). The c-index of our model is 0.70, which is higher than the c-index values of Lin et al (2021) (0.66); Ma et al (2021) (0.63); Zhu et al (2021) (0.66); Xie et al 2022 (0.68); and Deng et al (2022) (0.64) models ( Figure 4J ). The c-index values of our model based on CPTAC and GEO57495 were 0.595 ( Supplementary Figure S1C ) and 0.596 ( Supplementary Figure S1D ), respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…(H) K-M curves of the survival probability in patients with stages 3–4 disease ( p < 0.05). (I) 1-year ROC curves of the risk score in Lin et al (2021) , Ma et al (2021) , Zhu et al (2021) , Xie et al 2022 , Deng et al (2022) , and our models. (J) C-index of different models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, inflammation is an important hallmark of cancer and plays an integral role in the development and progression of cancer. Previous studies have indicated that inflammatory-related gene signatures can predict the prognosis and impact the immune status of HCC[ 22 ], lung adenocarcinoma[ 39 ], head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[ 40 ], and pancreatic adenocarcinoma[ 41 ]. These findings suggest that inflammatory-related genes could be used as tumour prognostic markers and are closely related to tumorigenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to other prediction signatures of PAAD, such as research focused on necroptosis-related gene, [33] cuprotosis programmed-cell-death-related lncRNA, [34] extracellular matrix-related genes, [35] ferroposis-related genes, [36] anoikis-related long noncoding RNAs [37] as well as inflammatory response-related genes, [38] we constructed a signature with less genes but higher AUC. A more concise model means economic advantage in clinical application, and a model with superior AUC achieves better clinically meaningful prediction for PAAD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%