1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00053142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a simple approach to modelling tree shading in agroforestry systems

Abstract: There have been a number of models developed which attempt to predict the shading patterns beneath individual tree or forest canopies. We describe a computer-based model which is able to estimate shading patterns through a discontinuous canopy of pruned trees. The model is designed to assist in the layout and management of agroforestry systems with widely spaced trees. The model was tested against data collected from a seven-year-old agroforestry system involving radiata pine, located near Canberra, Australia.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microclimate research traditions provide important insights to local ways to deal with global climate change (Stigter 2007(Stigter , 2016. Shading has been represented in increasingly refined 1D, 2D and 3D models of tree canopies (Quesada et al 1989;Reid and Ferguson 1992;Charbonnier et al 2013;Rosskopf et al 2017). Simple models for light competition in discontinuous tree stands within AF shifted to a 2D representation of space (Talbot and Dupraz (2012).…”
Section: Current State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microclimate research traditions provide important insights to local ways to deal with global climate change (Stigter 2007(Stigter , 2016. Shading has been represented in increasingly refined 1D, 2D and 3D models of tree canopies (Quesada et al 1989;Reid and Ferguson 1992;Charbonnier et al 2013;Rosskopf et al 2017). Simple models for light competition in discontinuous tree stands within AF shifted to a 2D representation of space (Talbot and Dupraz (2012).…”
Section: Current State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of the light models varies both in terms of the geometric representation of the trees and the underlying light simulation algorithms. The simpler models rely on a small number of geometric primitives such as cylinders, cones, and ellipsoids to represent tree trunks and crowns and use simple algorithms to calculate shadows [27][28][29][30]. At the other end of the spectrum are sophisticated models that require high-resolution 3D data from trees and use complex algorithms such as ray tracing or radiative transfer models [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When modelling light availability in AFS, neither of these extremes of model complexity are desirable. Very simple models are likely to overestimate shading [27] or fail to map shading heterogeneity [29] due to the lacking inclusion of crown structure and architecture. Very complex models, on the other hand, are likely to be too costly due to the high computational and data requirements [30,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictive model predicts system behaviour and the consequences of management actions. It models interactions such as radiation interception (Giordano et al, 1986;Kuuluvainen and Pukkala, 1989;Reid and Ferguson, 1992) and sometimes deals with the effect of these interactions on production. In this case, the model integrates several climatic and edaphic factors and provides physical (McKeon et al, 1990;Sibbald et al, 1990;Msika, 1993) or economic outputs (Doyle et al, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%