2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a second-generation metal-on-metal bearing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tests lasting for longer time intervals than the run-in period will appear less severe than test stopped during of just after run-in. On the other hand, different conclusions on the effect of a certain parameter can be drawn depending on the number of cycles considered: for example in Rieker's study [2] when taking a short number of cycles clearance appears to promote wear while it has no significant effect after longer periods. Further, if one considers wear severity (wear coefficient or linear wear per cycle) instead of cumulative wear the effect of test duration becomes even more relevant with differences of one order of magnitude depending on considered number of cycles.…”
Section: Simulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Tests lasting for longer time intervals than the run-in period will appear less severe than test stopped during of just after run-in. On the other hand, different conclusions on the effect of a certain parameter can be drawn depending on the number of cycles considered: for example in Rieker's study [2] when taking a short number of cycles clearance appears to promote wear while it has no significant effect after longer periods. Further, if one considers wear severity (wear coefficient or linear wear per cycle) instead of cumulative wear the effect of test duration becomes even more relevant with differences of one order of magnitude depending on considered number of cycles.…”
Section: Simulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degradation of metal-on-metal (mainly CoCrMo) artificial joints has been the object of an increasing number of scientific in-vitro investigations. Aspects such a lubrication, clearance, wear patterns and mechanical testing methods have been throughout analysed and reviews are available [2,[15][16][17]. Rieker et al [2] studied the relationship between clearance and linear wear rate for MoM bearings and found that the wear rate decreased with decreasing clearance down to a minimum value specific for a given particular design of the MoM articulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7) However, the wear debris of MOP articulated prostheses, mostly generated from polyethylene particles by wearing due to abrasion by carbides precipitated in the CoCr-Mo alloy, has been correlated with particle-induced osteolysis and implant loosening. 8,9) As an alternative to MOP articulated prosthesis, Metal-on-Metal (MOM) articulated prostheses are increasingly gaining more acceptance, [10][11][12][13] since the wear rate of MOM (3.0 mm/year) is lower than that of MOP (100-200 mm/year). 14,15) The forged Co-Cr-Mo alloy without any Ni and C added has a fine grained microstructure and has higher mechanical properties than conventional Co-Cr-Mo alloys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%