Development and Validation of a Scale to Assess Moral Disengagement in High-Carbon Behavior

Abstract

The reduction of individual carbon consumption could make an important contribution to the worldwide effort to limit global warming. Based on Bandura’s theory of moral disengagement, we hypothesized that the propensity to morally disengage concerning high-carbon behaviors (e.g., eating meat or traveling by plane) is one important factor that prevents individuals from reducing their carbon footprint. To measure the propensity to morally disengage in high-carbon-related behavior contexts, a questionnaire (MD-HCB) was developed and psychometrically validated in an online study with a German sample (N = 220). Confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the final nine-item scale had a one-dimensional structure, as intended. The internal consistency of the scale was excellent (Cronbach’s α = 0.94) and the scale interpretation had predictive validity for both past low-carbon consumption behavior and the intention to engage in such behavior in the future. Correlational analyses with relevant existing instruments confirmed the construct validity of the interpretations that can be drawn from the MD-HCB, as its resulting score is related to, yet separable from, the general tendency to morally disengage and is meaningfully connected to related constructs. A pre-study with a student sample (N = 89) not only helped to identify limitations in the study design but also showed a weak predictive ability of moral competence concerning high-carbon consumption behavior and intention to change. Based on our findings, future media campaigns designed to increase people’s intention to reduce high-carbon behavior could focus on the modification of common cognitive disengagement strategies.

Distinguishing between Low- and High-Cost Pro-Environmental Behavior: Empirical Evidence from Two Complementary Studies

“…The survey sub-dataset was from a representative online survey that was conducted in Germany and in the German language in July 2020 [18]. The survey included questions on socio-demographics, aspects of morals, emotions, and justice, and past behavior and intentions to show certain pro-environmental behaviors in the future.…”

Development of character assessment instrument on English learning for middle school students

“…The validity of data collection tools or instruments is the most complicated and most important thing to consider when conducting or criticizing a study (Vogt, 2018). Instrument validity refers to the extent to which the instrument precisely measures the dimensions it is supposed to measure or collects accurate data (Kleemann et al, 2023;Zhang & Garcia, 2023). There are three general or main types of validity traditionally consisting of content validity, construct validity, and criterion validity (Heale & Twycross, 2015;Yusuf, 2015;Azwar, 2021).…”